Hazel-Anne M. Johnson

9 total papers · 625 total citations
6 papers, 481 citations indexed

About

Hazel-Anne M. Johnson is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Hazel-Anne M. Johnson has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 481 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Social Psychology, 2 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Hazel-Anne M. Johnson's work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper). Hazel-Anne M. Johnson is often cited by papers focused on Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper). Hazel-Anne M. Johnson collaborates with scholars based in United States. Hazel-Anne M. Johnson's co-authors include Paul E. Spector, Monika M. Wahi, S. J. Nazian, Steven B. Goldin, Michael Τ. Brannick, Xian Xu, Tammy D. Allen, Ozgun Burcu Rodopman and Charles N. Paidas and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Education, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology and Journal of Surgical Research.

In The Last Decade

Hazel-Anne M. Johnson

6 papers receiving 426 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Hazel-Anne M. Johnson 280 247 230 122 84 6 481
Vipanchi Mishra 155 0.6× 151 0.6× 200 0.9× 157 1.3× 78 0.9× 14 509
Christina M. Moran 153 0.5× 233 0.9× 266 1.2× 90 0.7× 60 0.7× 9 506
Lu Luo 134 0.5× 149 0.6× 100 0.4× 94 0.8× 113 1.3× 10 420
Kyoko Shimada 259 0.9× 245 1.0× 179 0.8× 146 1.2× 104 1.2× 16 522
Judith Webster 98 0.3× 138 0.6× 163 0.7× 212 1.7× 77 0.9× 9 499
Megan Huth 157 0.6× 159 0.6× 180 0.8× 74 0.6× 76 0.9× 8 475
Gintare Visockaite 122 0.4× 166 0.7× 108 0.5× 269 2.2× 128 1.5× 6 547
Hitomi Nashiwa 94 0.3× 218 0.9× 216 0.9× 203 1.7× 75 0.9× 7 502
Krista J. Brockwood 251 0.9× 126 0.5× 162 0.7× 189 1.5× 62 0.7× 13 471
Janet Mantler 78 0.3× 267 1.1× 121 0.5× 93 0.8× 159 1.9× 13 484

Countries citing papers authored by Hazel-Anne M. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel-Anne M. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel-Anne M. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel-Anne M. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel-Anne M. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel-Anne M. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel-Anne M. Johnson. The network helps show where Hazel-Anne M. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hazel-Anne M. Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hazel-Anne M. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hazel-Anne M. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hazel-Anne M. Johnson. Hazel-Anne M. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026