Nursing Standard

13.0k papers and 62.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.0k papers published in Nursing Standard in the last decades have received a total of 62.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Nursing Standard usually cover General Health Professions (2.3k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (926 papers) and Surgery (624 papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare Systems and Challenges (502 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (359 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (347 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nursing Standard are Lorraine Hicking-Woodison, Simon Wright, Jaquelina Hewitt‐Taylor, Michael Marmot, Ruth Bell, Bob Price, Vanora Hundley, Edwin van Teijlingen, Dinah Gould and Christian Duffin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nursing Standard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nursing Standard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nursing Standard.

Countries where authors publish in Nursing Standard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nursing Standard. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nursing Standard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nursing Standard more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025