Hao Chiang

568 citations
15 papers · 451 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 8
    • Ion channel regulation and function 2
    • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes 2

Hao Chiang

15 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Hao Chiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Sensory Systems 58
  • Developmental Neuroscience 37
  • Physiology 202
  • Structural Biology 9
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 108
Replace Tae‐Ryong Riew with:
Tae‐Ryong Riew South Korea
Federica La Russa United Kingdom
Matthew Thakur United Kingdom
Chunli Zhao China
Annalisa Nicotra Italy
Michaela Prochazkova United States
Zhongya Wei China
André Machado Xavier Brazil
Olivier Poirot Switzerland
Qini Gan United States
Hao Chiang relative to Tae‐Ryong Riew South Korea Tae‐Ryong Riew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Tae‐Ryong Riew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hao Chiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hao Chiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hao Chiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hao Chiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hao Chiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hao Chiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hao Chiang. The network helps show where Hao Chiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hao Chiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hao Chiang Line = papers co-authored together Hao Chiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201484
2 201549
3 201242
4 201241
5 200840
6 201937
7 202036
8 201424
9 202022
10 200820
11 201618
12 201716
13 201312
14 20139
15 20231

About Hao Chiang

Hao Chiang is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Pharmacology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (2 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (2 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (58 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (37 citations), Physiology (202 citations), Structural Biology (9 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (108 citations). Hao Chiang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sung‐Tsang Hsieh, Yu‐Lin Hsieh, June‐Horng Lue, To-Jung Tseng, Hitoshi Komuro, Hung‐Wei Kan, Don Mahad, Nobuhiko Ohno, Bruce D. Trapp and Whei‐Min Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Annals of Neurology, Scientific Reports, Journal of Dental Sciences and Cells.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact