H. Pinkham

808 total citations
13 papers, 362 citations indexed

About

H. Pinkham is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Applied Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, H. Pinkham has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 362 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Geometry and Topology, 5 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 3 papers in Applied Mathematics. Recurrent topics in H. Pinkham's work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (8 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (5 papers) and Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (3 papers). H. Pinkham is often cited by papers focused on Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (8 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (5 papers) and Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (3 papers). H. Pinkham collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. H. Pinkham's co-authors include Ulf Persson, Michel Demazure, Bernard Teissier, Ian Morrison and Robert Friedman and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Mathematics, Inventiones mathematicae and Duke Mathematical Journal.

In The Last Decade

H. Pinkham

13 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
H. Pinkham United States	9	329	146	122	85	52	13	362
John Fogarty United States	7	352 1.1×	192 1.3×	132 1.1×	74 0.9×	38 0.7×	13	396
Geir Ellingsrud Norway	14	510 1.6×	301 2.1×	167 1.4×	100 1.2×	31 0.6×	21	545
Robert Silhol France	9	240 0.7×	132 0.9×	46 0.4×	77 0.9×	37 0.7×	25	272
J. M. Boardman United States	8	262 0.8×	259 1.8×	143 1.2×	33 0.4×	52 1.0×	16	370
Terence Gaffney United States	13	290 0.9×	131 0.9×	136 1.1×	100 1.2×	81 1.6×	31	388
V A Iskovskih	6	434 1.3×	216 1.5×	76 0.6×	92 1.1×	66 1.3×	6	463
Sorin Popescu United States	12	343 1.0×	126 0.9×	242 2.0×	154 1.8×	13 0.3×	20	402
Jason Starr United States	10	424 1.3×	237 1.6×	83 0.7×	91 1.1×	76 1.5×	21	433
Norman L. Alling United States	10	232 0.7×	138 0.9×	119 1.0×	85 1.0×	99 1.9×	29	359
C. P. Ramanujam India	7	311 0.9×	137 0.9×	109 0.9×	74 0.9×	62 1.2×	8	352

Countries citing papers authored by H. Pinkham

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Pinkham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Pinkham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Pinkham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Pinkham

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Pinkham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Pinkham. The network helps show where H. Pinkham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Pinkham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Pinkham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Pinkham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Pinkham. H. Pinkham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Morrison, Ian & H. Pinkham. (1986). Galois Weierstrass Points and Hurwitz Characters. Annals of Mathematics. 124(3). 591–591. 10 indexed citations

2.

Pinkham, H.. (1986). A Castelnuovo bound for smooth surfaces. Inventiones mathematicae. 83(2). 321–332. 38 indexed citations

3.

Pinkham, H.. (1984). Automorphisms of cusps and Inoue-Hirzebruch surfaces. Compositio Mathematica. 52(3). 299–313. 12 indexed citations

4.

Friedman, Robert & H. Pinkham. (1984). Smoothings of cusp singularities via triangle singularities. Compositio Mathematica. 53(3). 303–316. 5 indexed citations

5.

Persson, Ulf & H. Pinkham. (1983). Some examples of nonsmoothable varieties with normal crossings. Duke Mathematical Journal. 50(2). 5 indexed citations

6.

Persson, Ulf & H. Pinkham. (1981). Degeneration of Surfaces with Trivial Canonical Bundle. Annals of Mathematics. 113(1). 45–45. 66 indexed citations

7.

Demazure, Michel, H. Pinkham, & Bernard Teissier. (1980). Séminaire sur les singularités des surfaces : Centre de mathématiques de l'Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau, 1976-1977. Springer eBooks. 15 indexed citations

8.

Pinkham, H.. (1978). Deformations of normal surface singularities withC* action. Mathematische Annalen. 232(1). 65–84. 33 indexed citations

9.

Demazure, Michel, H. Pinkham, & Bernard Teissier. (1977). Séminaire sur les singularités des surfaces, 1976-1977. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 5 indexed citations

10.

Pinkham, H.. (1977). Normal surface singularities withC* action. Mathematische Annalen. 227(2). 183–193. 80 indexed citations

11.

Pinkham, H.. (1975). On a result of Riemenschneider. manuscripta mathematica. 16(2). 137–144. 1 indexed citations

12.

Pinkham, H.. (1974). Deformations of algebraic varieties with G[m] action. French digital mathematics library (Numdam). 74 indexed citations

13.

Pinkham, H.. (1974). Deformations of cones with negative grading. Journal of Algebra. 30(1-3). 92–102. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact