H. Ned Seelye
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Education top 10%
- Linguistics and Language top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Robert C. LafayetteMarilynn B. BrewerHoward Lee NostrandSally Sieloff MagnanTheodore V. HiggsRobert G. Mead
- Topics
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers)Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers)Second Language Learning and Teaching (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GuatemalaUnited States
In The Last Decade
H. Ned Seelye
18 papers receiving 383 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Language and Linguistics 237
- Literature and Literary Theory 189
- Education 125
- Linguistics and Language 115
- Sociology and Political Science 96
Countries citing papers authored by H. Ned Seelye
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Ned Seelye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Ned Seelye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Ned Seelye more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. Ned Seelye
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Ned Seelye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Ned Seelye. The network helps show where H. Ned Seelye may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Ned Seelye
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Ned Seelye. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Ned Seelye based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Ned Seelye. H. Ned Seelye is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Culture Clash | 115 |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 225 | |
| 8 | Intercultural Communicator Resources. | 2 |
| 9 | 51 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | Perspectives for Teachers of Latin American Culture. | 9 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | CULTURE IN THE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM. | 6 |
| 17 | A handbook on Latin America for teachers : methodology and annotated bibliography | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About H. Ned Seelye
H. Ned Seelye is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics and Applied Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (115 citations), Language and Linguistics (237 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (189 citations). H. Ned Seelye has collaborated with scholars based in Guatemala and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Lafayette, Marilynn B. Brewer, Howard Lee Nostrand, Sally Sieloff Magnan, Theodore V. Higgs and Robert G. Mead. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, Science Education and Language Learning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.