Robert G. Mead
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism 14
- Spanish Literature and Culture Studies 8
- Cultural and Social Studies in Latin America 5
- Latin American Literature Analysis 3
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Latin American Literature Studies 18
-
- Cinema History and Criticism 4
-
- Spanish Philosophy and Literature 3
-
- Latin American Cultural Politics 3
- Co-authors
- John B. DalborMartin S. StabbPeter G. EarleÁngel FloresWillis Knapp JonesH. Ned SeelyeLeopoldo ZeaJohn S. Brushwood
- Journals
- Modern Language Journal (1 paper)Hispanic American Historical Review (1 paper)MLN (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert G. Mead
26 papers receiving 76 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Literature and Literary Theory 55
- Linguistics and Language 16
- Language and Linguistics 29
- Cultural Studies 17
- Classics 3
Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Mead
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Mead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Mead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Mead. The network helps show where Robert G. Mead may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 2 | Foreign Languages: Key Links in the Chain of Learning. | 1983 | 16 |
| 3 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1976 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1965 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1964 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1964 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1961 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1960 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1959 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1959 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1959 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1957 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1956 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1955 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1955 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1953 | 2 |
About Robert G. Mead
Robert G. Mead is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Literature and Literary Theory and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 42 papers that have together received 109 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Latin American Literature Studies (18 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (14 papers), Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (8 papers), Cultural and Social Studies in Latin America (5 papers), Cinema History and Criticism (4 papers), Latin American Literature Analysis (3 papers), Spanish Philosophy and Literature (3 papers) and Latin American Cultural Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations), Linguistics and Language (16 citations) and Language and Linguistics (29 citations). Robert G. Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John B. Dalbor, Martin S. Stabb, Peter G. Earle, Ángel Flores, Willis Knapp Jones, H. Ned Seelye, Leopoldo Zea and John S. Brushwood. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, Hispanic American Historical Review and MLN.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.