H. G. C. King
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Soil Science top 10%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 4
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 3
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 2
-
- Plant Reproductive Biology 2
- Co-authors
- G. W. Heath (1 shared paper)G. Pruden (6 shared papers)Qiong Zhang (6 shared papers)Shunyuan Xiao (6 shared papers)Xianfeng Ma (6 shared papers)Robert Berkey (5 shared papers)David Daniels (1 shared paper)Felipe San Martín H. (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Analyst (4 papers)Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (3 papers)The Plant Cell (2 papers)Plant Signaling & Behavior (1 paper)PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
H. G. C. King
25 papers receiving 634 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Biochemistry 56
- Soil Science 87
- Plant Science 330
- Insect Science 56
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 52
Countries citing papers authored by H. G. C. King
This map shows the geographic impact of H. G. C. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. G. C. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. G. C. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. G. C. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. G. C. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. G. C. King. The network helps show where H. G. C. King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. G. C. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1967 | 195 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 89 | |
| 3 | 1963 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 6 | 1962 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 8 | 1969 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 11 | 1968 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1968 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1972 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1970 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1957 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1966 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1969 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1967 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1961 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 7 |
About H. G. C. King
H. G. C. King is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Analytical Chemistry and Biochemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (4 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (2 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (2 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (2 papers) and Tannin, Tannase and Anticancer Activities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (56 citations), Soil Science (87 citations), Plant Science (330 citations), Insect Science (56 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (52 citations). H. G. C. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include G. W. Heath, G. Pruden, Qiong Zhang, Shunyuan Xiao, Xianfeng Ma, Robert Berkey, David Daniels, Felipe San Martín H., Yi Zhang and C. Bloomfield. Their work appears in journals such as The Analyst, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, The Plant Cell, Plant Signaling & Behavior and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.