G. W. Heath
- Soil Science top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- C. A. EdwardsH. G. C. KingA. R. D. StebbingH. K. Airy ShawF. J. G. EblingJeffrey D. WeidenhamerLeslie A. WestonC. Findlay
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers)Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (3 papers)Entomological Studies and Ecology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
G. W. Heath
21 papers receiving 455 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Soil Science 189
- Plant Science 176
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 151
- Ecology 147
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 117
Countries citing papers authored by G. W. Heath
This map shows the geographic impact of G. W. Heath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. W. Heath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. W. Heath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. W. Heath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. W. Heath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. W. Heath. The network helps show where G. W. Heath may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. W. Heath
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. W. Heath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. W. Heath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. W. Heath. G. W. Heath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Field evaluation of Australian commercial wheat genotypes for competitive traits and weed suppression | 1 |
| 2 | Field evaluation of Australian wheat genotypes for competitive traits and weed suppression | 4 |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | The Future of man : proceedings of a Symposium held at the Royal Geographical Society London, on 1 April, 1971 | 1 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 196 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 43 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | The role of soil animals in breakdown of leaf material | 99 |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About G. W. Heath
G. W. Heath is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (3 papers) and Entomological Studies and Ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (189 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (117 citations) and Insect Science (108 citations). G. W. Heath has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include C. A. Edwards, H. G. C. King, A. R. D. Stebbing, H. K. Airy Shaw, F. J. G. Ebling, Jeffrey D. Weidenhamer, Leslie A. Weston, C. Findlay, Hanwen Wu and Jane Quinn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Ecology, Veterinary Record and Marine Environmental Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.