Gustavo Hassemer
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science
- Pharmacology
- Co-authors
- Nina RønstedRafael TrevisanLUÍS ADRIANO FUNEZHeidi M. MeudtAlexey ShipunovRenato De GiovanniPedro Maria Abreu FerreiraMarcos Vinícius Meiado
- Topics
- Plant Diversity and Evolution (65 papers)Plant and animal studies (28 papers)Fern and Epiphyte Biology (23 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaMoleculesJournal of Ethnopharmacology
- Partner nations
- BrazilDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gustavo Hassemer
78 papers receiving 447 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 295
- Plant Science 248
- Molecular Biology 175
- Food Science 45
- Pharmacology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Gustavo Hassemer
This map shows the geographic impact of Gustavo Hassemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gustavo Hassemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gustavo Hassemer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gustavo Hassemer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gustavo Hassemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gustavo Hassemer. The network helps show where Gustavo Hassemer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gustavo Hassemer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gustavo Hassemer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gustavo Hassemer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gustavo Hassemer. Gustavo Hassemer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | New records of naturalised Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) in Brazil | 2 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Gustavo Hassemer
Gustavo Hassemer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Forestry, having authored 86 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (65 papers), Plant and animal studies (28 papers) and Fern and Epiphyte Biology (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (295 citations), Plant Science (248 citations) and Pharmacology (31 citations). Gustavo Hassemer has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nina Rønsted, Rafael Trevisan, LUÍS ADRIANO FUNEZ, Heidi M. Meudt, Alexey Shipunov, Renato De Giovanni, Pedro Maria Abreu Ferreira, Marcos Vinícius Meiado, Barbara G. Briggs and Duilio Iamonico. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Molecules and Journal of Ethnopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.