Richard V. Lansdown

1.3k citations
34 papers · 594 indexed · h-index 9

Richard V. Lansdown

31 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers

Richard V. Lansdown
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 249
  • Ecological Modeling 50
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 107
  • Plant Science 317
  • Safety Research 48
Replace Penelope Wurm with:
Penelope Wurm Australia
Alejandra Becerra Argentina
Zhenxing Zhou China
Lars Peter Kvist Denmark
Leanne Webb Australia
Lisanework Nigatu Ethiopia
P. Ssegawa Uganda
Amber C. Churchill United States
Wu Ning China
María Teresa Pulido Silva Mexico
Richard V. Lansdown relative to Penelope Wurm Australia Penelope Wurm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Penelope Wurm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard V. Lansdown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard V. Lansdown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard V. Lansdown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard V. Lansdown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard V. Lansdown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard V. Lansdown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard V. Lansdown. The network helps show where Richard V. Lansdown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard V. Lansdown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard V. Lansdown Line = papers co-authored together Richard V. Lansdown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20221
3 20221
4 20211
5 20192
6 20191
7 201823
8 20171
9 20177
10 201610
11
Review of Alien Freshwater Vascular Plants in South-east Europe
20168
12 20118
13
Red Duckweed (Lemna turionifera Landolt) new to Britain
20084
14 2006108
15
The status and conservation of stoneworts (Characeae) in West Gloucestershire (v.c. 34) and North Somerset (v.c. 6)
20063
16 20069
17
Notes on the water-starworts (Callitriche) recorded in Europe
200611
18 20042
19 19941
20 19884

About Richard V. Lansdown

Richard V. Lansdown is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 34 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (16 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (10 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (9 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (7 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (7 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (6 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (4 papers) and Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (249 citations), Ecological Modeling (50 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (107 citations). Richard V. Lansdown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Nigel Maxted, Melanie Bilz, Shelagh Kell, Keith Sullivan, Kavita Sethuraman, Angelo Troìa, Fred Rumsey, Rajanathan Rajaratnam, Ioannis Bazos and Yuri P. Ivanenko. Their work appears in journals such as Conservation Biology, Taxon and Aquatic Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026