Greg M. Kramer
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
-
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Papers in
-
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 3
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 1
-
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation 3
- Co-authors
- Matt Mishkind (2 shared papers)Kirk Heilbrun (3 shared papers)Julie T. Kinn (1 shared paper)Su‐Ting T. Li (1 shared paper)Donald M. Hilty (1 shared paper)Allison Crawford (1 shared paper)Nadiya Sunderji (1 shared paper)John Teshima (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (1 paper)Professional Psychology Research and Practice (1 paper)Stem Cell Research & Therapy (1 paper)Behavioral Sciences & the Law (1 paper)International Review of Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Greg M. Kramer
10 papers receiving 238 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Applied Psychology 51
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 102
- Health Informatics 4
- General Health Professions 61
- Clinical Psychology 44
Countries citing papers authored by Greg M. Kramer
This map shows the geographic impact of Greg M. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg M. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg M. Kramer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Greg M. Kramer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg M. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg M. Kramer. The network helps show where Greg M. Kramer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Greg M. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 108 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 2 |
About Greg M. Kramer
Greg M. Kramer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper) and Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (51 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (102 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations), General Health Professions (61 citations) and Clinical Psychology (44 citations). Greg M. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Matt Mishkind, Kirk Heilbrun, Julie T. Kinn, Su‐Ting T. Li, Donald M. Hilty, Allison Crawford, Nadiya Sunderji, John Teshima, John Luo and Steven Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Stem Cell Research & Therapy, Behavioral Sciences & the Law and International Review of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.