Replace International Journal of Law and Psychiatry with:
International Journal of Law and PsychiatryUnited States
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative CriminologyUnited States
Disability & SocietyUnited Kingdom
Psychology Crime and LawUnited Kingdom
Criminal Justice and BehaviorUnited States
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportementCanada
Psychology Public Policy and LawUnited States
Law and Human BehaviorUnited States
Journal of Applied Developmental PsychologyUnited States
Basic and Applied Social PsychologyUnited States
International Journal of Law and PsychiatryUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Behavioral Sciences & the Law · 1×
×1.127.3kCP
×0.713.2kSPS
×0.76.1kSP
×1.96.9kGHP
×0.51.9kCN
Citations per year, relative to Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Behavioral Sciences & the Law · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavioral Sciences & the Law more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
This network shows the impact of papers published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.