Nadiya Sunderji
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Allison CrawfordDonald M. HiltyAlice CharachSteven ChanMarijana JovanovićSophie SoklaridisAllyson IonJohn Teshima
- Topics
- Mental Health Treatment and Access (12 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (9 papers)Healthcare Systems and Technology (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Applied PsychologyGeneral Health ProfessionsPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nadiya Sunderji
39 papers receiving 679 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- General Health Professions 313
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 290
- Clinical Psychology 178
- Social Psychology 148
- Applied Psychology 146
Countries citing papers authored by Nadiya Sunderji
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadiya Sunderji's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadiya Sunderji with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadiya Sunderji more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadiya Sunderji
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadiya Sunderji. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadiya Sunderji. The network helps show where Nadiya Sunderji may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadiya Sunderji
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadiya Sunderji. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadiya Sunderji based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadiya Sunderji. Nadiya Sunderji is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 106 | |
| 20 | 58 |
About Nadiya Sunderji
Nadiya Sunderji is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and General Health Professions, having authored 40 papers that have together received 703 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (12 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (9 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (146 citations), General Health Professions (313 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (290 citations). Nadiya Sunderji has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Allison Crawford, Donald M. Hilty, Alice Charach, Steven Chan, Marijana Jovanović, Sophie Soklaridis, Allyson Ion, John Teshima, Robert M. McCarron and Vicky Stergiopoulos. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Academic Medicine and Psychiatric Services.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.