Nineteenth Century Contexts

617 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 617 papers published in Nineteenth Century Contexts in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Nineteenth Century Contexts usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (199 papers), History (146 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (129 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (60 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (44 papers) and Travel Writing and Literature (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nineteenth Century Contexts are Anna Kornbluh, Anne K. Mellor, Jesse Oak Taylor, John M. MacKenzie, Mary Louise Pratt, Maria H. Frawley, Jennifer L. Fleissner, Richard L. Stein, Alan Richardson and Daniel Williams.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nineteenth Century Contexts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nineteenth Century Contexts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nineteenth Century Contexts.

Countries where authors publish in Nineteenth Century Contexts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nineteenth Century Contexts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nineteenth Century Contexts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nineteenth Century Contexts more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025