G Hole

3.8k citations
81 papers · 2.7k indexed · h-index 26

G Hole

78 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

G Hole
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.0k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 659
  • Social Psychology 532
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 176
Replace David Navon with:
David Navon Israel
Mark B. Neider United States
Karen E. Adolph United States
Richard I. Kemp Australia
Shaun P. Vecera United States
Stephen R. Mitroff United States
T. K. Pitcairn United Kingdom
Carrick C. Williams United States
Jing Feng United States
Alinda Friedman Canada
G Hole relative to David Navon Israel David Navon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
David Navon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G Hole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G Hole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G Hole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G Hole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G Hole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G Hole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G Hole. The network helps show where G Hole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G Hole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G Hole Line = papers co-authored together G Hole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20231
3 20202
4 201121
5 2009113
6 200822
7
Dissociating mechanisms involved in accessing identity by dynamic and static cues
20078
8 200729
9 20065
10 20057
11 199589
12 19926
13 199113
14 199130
15
Depression and suicide. Is there a difference between suicidal and non-suicidal depressed inpatients ?
19903
16
Suicide risk in suicidal versus nonsuicidal depressed inpatients.
19908
17 19872
18 198723
19 19866
20
[Somatic symptoms and depth of depression in depressive states. Quantitative comparison in profile and course].
19731

About G Hole

G Hole is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (33 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (26 papers), Face recognition and analysis (17 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers) and Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.0k citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (659 citations). G Hole has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andy P. Field, Patricia A George, Stephan Collishaw, Virginia Harrison, Michael J. Morgan, Andrew Glennerster, Michael F. Land, Victoria J. Bourne, George Butterworth and Tony Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Perception, Visual Cognition, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Pharmacopsychiatry and Ergonomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026