Graeme Duke
Impact in
- Emergency Medicine top 1%
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Papers in
-
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 26
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies 8
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation 7
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders 9
- Co-authors
- Juris BriedisDavid PilcherGraeme K. HartAndrew D. BerstenJohn D. SantamariaMichael BaileyAndrew CasamentoRinaldo Bellomo
- Journals
- Critical Care and Resuscitation (14 papers)Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (9 papers)The Medical Journal of Australia (6 papers)Critical Care Medicine (4 papers)Australian Critical Care (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Graeme Duke
53 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Emergency Medicine 573
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 191
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 100
- Emergency Medical Services 133
- Nephrology 130
Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Duke
This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Duke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Duke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Duke. The network helps show where Graeme Duke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graeme Duke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 110 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 82 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 52 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 64 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 4 |
About Graeme Duke
Graeme Duke is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Information Management, Nephrology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (26 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (22 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (9 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (8 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (8 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (8 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (7 papers) and Medical Coding and Health Information (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (573 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (191 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (100 citations), Emergency Medical Services (133 citations) and Nephrology (130 citations). Graeme Duke has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Juris Briedis, David Pilcher, Graeme K. Hart, Andrew D. Bersten, John D. Santamaria, Michael Bailey, Andrew Casamento, Rinaldo Bellomo, Daryl Jones and Peter Stow. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care and Resuscitation, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Medical Journal of Australia, Critical Care Medicine and Australian Critical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.