Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

4.7k papers and 62.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.7k papers published in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care in the last decades have received a total of 62.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care usually cover Surgery (1.7k papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1.4k papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (788 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (710 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (688 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care are M. McD. Fisher, W. B. Runciman, Kwok M. Ho, R. K. Webb, W. J. Russell, M. J. Paech, T. C. K. Brown, John Williamson, Paul S. Myles and Rinaldo Bellomo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.

Countries where authors publish in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anaesthesia and Intensive Care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025