Giles Newton‐Howes

4.8k citations
109 papers · 2.9k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 25
Topics
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (38 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (31 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (25 papers)

In The Last Decade

Giles Newton‐Howes

103 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

Psychological distress and psychiatric disorder after nat...20182026202020232018202250100150200250

Peers

Giles Newton‐Howes
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Clinical Psychology 2.2k
  • Philosophy 665
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 572
  • Social Psychology 312
  • Epidemiology 290
Replace Brin F. S. Grenyer with:
Brin F. S. Grenyer Australia
Allan Abbass Canada
Saeed Farooq United Kingdom
Shanaya Rathod United Kingdom
Jutta Stoffers‐Winterling Germany
Naotaka Shinfuku Japan
Michela Nosè Italy
Conor Duggan United Kingdom
Tim Amos United Kingdom
Louanne W. Davis United States
Giles Newton‐Howes relative to Brin F. S. Grenyer Australia Brin F. S. Grenyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Brin F. S. Grenyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giles Newton‐Howes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giles Newton‐Howes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles Newton‐Howes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles Newton‐Howes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giles Newton‐Howes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles Newton‐Howes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles Newton‐Howes. The network helps show where Giles Newton‐Howes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giles Newton‐Howes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giles Newton‐Howes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giles Newton‐Howes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giles Newton‐Howes. Giles Newton‐Howes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 9
5 5
6 4
7 1
8 9
9 5
10 13
11 25
12 13
13 5
14 28
15 2
16
Medicinal cannabis: moving the debate forward.
4
17 50
18 71
19 15
20 344

About Giles Newton‐Howes

Giles Newton‐Howes is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 109 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (38 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (31 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.2k citations), Philosophy (665 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (572 citations). Giles Newton‐Howes has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Tyrer, Roger Mulder, Tony Johnson, Joseph M. Boden, James Foulds, Ben Beaglehole, Andrew M. Chanen, Chris Frampton, Caroline Bell and Tim Weaver. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026