Josh Knight
- Surgery
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Epidemiology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Co-authors
- Philip ClarkeAn Tran‐DuyCameron GrantRod JacksonJan SinclairEdwin A. MitchellAlistair W. StewartCarlos A. Camargo
- Topics
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers)Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers)Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Issues, ethics and legal aspectsEndocrinology, Diabetes and MetabolismPathology and Forensic Medicine
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew ZealandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Josh Knight
19 papers receiving 248 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Surgery 47
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 40
- Epidemiology 40
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 39
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 38
Countries citing papers authored by Josh Knight
This map shows the geographic impact of Josh Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josh Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josh Knight more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Josh Knight
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josh Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josh Knight. The network helps show where Josh Knight may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Josh Knight
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Josh Knight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Josh Knight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Josh Knight. Josh Knight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 59 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Josh Knight
Josh Knight is a scholar working on Family Practice, Health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers) and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (38 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (40 citations). Josh Knight has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip Clarke, An Tran‐Duy, Cameron Grant, Rod Jackson, Jan Sinclair, Edwin A. Mitchell, Alistair W. Stewart, Carlos A. Camargo, Tania Milne and Julian Crane. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Diabetes Care and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.