Penelope Weller

639 total citations
44 papers, 362 citations indexed

About

Penelope Weller is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Penelope Weller has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 362 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Clinical Psychology, 16 papers in General Health Professions and 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Penelope Weller's work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (23 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (10 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (8 papers). Penelope Weller is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (23 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (10 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (8 papers). Penelope Weller collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Penelope Weller's co-authors include George Patton, Lena Sanci, Susan M. Sawyer, Lyndal Bond, Lisa Brophy, Graham Meadows, Ellie Fossey, Bernadette McSherry, John E. Gray and Joanne Enticott and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and The Medical Journal of Australia.

In The Last Decade

Penelope Weller

36 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Penelope Weller Australia 10 212 181 56 55 41 44 362
Joseph Duffy United Kingdom 7 133 0.6× 122 0.7× 39 0.7× 64 1.2× 9 0.2× 15 330
Nadia Mantovani United Kingdom 12 226 1.1× 168 0.9× 50 0.9× 151 2.7× 10 0.2× 29 478
A.J. van der Ham Netherlands 11 185 0.9× 140 0.8× 65 1.2× 78 1.4× 34 0.8× 29 351
Toby Williamson United Kingdom 10 114 0.5× 154 0.9× 32 0.6× 41 0.7× 28 0.7× 32 271
Beth Greenhill United Kingdom 10 92 0.4× 81 0.4× 46 0.8× 44 0.8× 9 0.2× 20 250
Kristjana Kristiansen Norway 7 182 0.9× 313 1.7× 23 0.4× 33 0.6× 34 0.8× 7 416
Robert Bland Australia 15 330 1.6× 321 1.8× 59 1.1× 83 1.5× 45 1.1× 41 591
Bhargavi V. Davar India 9 128 0.6× 118 0.7× 23 0.4× 49 0.9× 28 0.7× 15 272
Christine Valentine United Kingdom 14 457 2.2× 209 1.2× 113 2.0× 129 2.3× 10 0.2× 29 600
Miriam Evensen Norway 9 153 0.7× 132 0.7× 31 0.6× 74 1.3× 4 0.1× 21 348

Countries citing papers authored by Penelope Weller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Penelope Weller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Penelope Weller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Penelope Weller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Penelope Weller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Penelope Weller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Penelope Weller. The network helps show where Penelope Weller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Penelope Weller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Penelope Weller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Penelope Weller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Penelope Weller. Penelope Weller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Scholten, Matthé, et al.. (2025). An International Comparison of Psychiatric Advance Directive Policy: Across eleven jurisdictions and alongside advance directive policy. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 101. 102098–102098. 2 indexed citations
3.
Weller, Penelope, Frances Shawyer, Lisa Brophy, et al.. (2025). Psychiatrists’ engagement with advance statement in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 104. 102144–102144.
4.
Weller, Penelope, et al.. (2024). The Importance of Legal Accountability in Negligence and Mental Health Care. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 47(2).
5.
Fossey, Ellie, et al.. (2023). Consumer Views and Experiences of Secondary-Care Services Following REFOCUS-PULSAR Staff Recovery-Oriented Practices Training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(10). 5894–5894.
6.
Ramcharan, Paul, et al.. (2022). Supported residential services as a type of “total institution”: Implications for the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). Australian Journal of Social Issues. 58(2). 279–295. 4 indexed citations
7.
Brophy, Lisa, Steve Kisely, Sharon Lawn, et al.. (2022). The Urgent Need to Review the use of CTOs and Compliance with the UNCRPD Across Australian Jurisdictions. 3–9. 4 indexed citations
8.
Maylea, Chris, et al.. (2021). Consumers' experiences of rights-based mental health laws: Lessons from Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 78. 101737–101737. 11 indexed citations
9.
Enticott, Joanne, Frances Shawyer, Lisa Brophy, et al.. (2021). REFOCUS-PULSAR Recovery-Oriented Practice Training in Adult Primary Mental Health Care: Exploratory Findings Including From a Pretest–Posttest Evaluation. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 12. 625408–625408. 2 indexed citations
10.
Steele, Linda, et al.. (2020). The Legacies of Institutionalisation : Disability, Law and Policy in the ‘Deinstitutionalised’ Community. Hart Publishing eBooks. 4 indexed citations
11.
Meadows, Graham, Lisa Brophy, Frances Shawyer, et al.. (2019). REFOCUS-PULSAR recovery-oriented practice training in specialist mental health care: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry. 6(2). 103–114. 43 indexed citations
12.
Weller, Penelope. (2019). Mothers and mental illness: Breaking the silence about child loss. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 67. 101500–101500. 2 indexed citations
13.
Weller, Penelope, et al.. (2019). The need for independent advocacy for people subject to mental health community treatment orders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 66. 101452–101452. 3 indexed citations
14.
Brophy, Lisa, et al.. (2019). The experience of the use of Community Treatment Orders following recovery-oriented practice training. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 64. 178–183. 8 indexed citations
15.
Weller, Penelope. (2018). Mainstreaming TJ in Australia: Challenges and Opportunities. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).
16.
Shawyer, Frances, Joanne Enticott, Lisa Brophy, et al.. (2017). The PULSAR Specialist Care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized control trial of a training intervention for community mental health teams in recovery-oriented practice. BMC Psychiatry. 17(1). 172–172. 9 indexed citations
18.
Gray, John E., Bernadette McSherry, Richard O’Reilly, & Penelope Weller. (2010). Australian and Canadian Mental Health Acts Compared. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).
19.
Weller, Penelope. (2010). Developing Law and Ethics. Alternative Law Journal. 35(1). 8–12. 3 indexed citations
20.
Weller, Penelope. (2008). Supported decision-making and the achievement of non-discrimination: The promise and paradox of the disabilities convention. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026