Gero Federkeil

468 citations
9 papers · 276 indexed · h-index 5

Gero Federkeil

7 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

Gero Federkeil
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Research and Theory 5
  • Education 92
  • General Health Professions 72
  • Political Science and International Relations 65
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
Replace Neil W. Hamilton with:
Neil W. Hamilton United States
Linda Crane Australia
Judith Berman United States
Gemma Sinead Ryan United Kingdom
Suzanne Shale United Kingdom
John McCormack Australia
Kogilam Naidoo Australia
Nick Boreham United Kingdom
Marion L. Pearson Canada
William T. Mallon United States
Gero Federkeil relative to Neil W. Hamilton United States Neil W. Hamilton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Neil W. Hamilton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gero Federkeil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gero Federkeil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gero Federkeil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gero Federkeil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gero Federkeil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gero Federkeil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gero Federkeil. The network helps show where Gero Federkeil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Gero Federkeil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gero Federkeil Line = papers co-authored together Gero Federkeil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
U-Multirank: A European multidimensional transparency tool in higher education
20181
2
U-Multirank. A New Multi-Dimensional Transparency Tool in Higher Education
20160
3
U-Map and U-Multirank: some first results and reflections on two new profiling and ranking tools for higher education institutions.
20111
4 2010159
5
Benchmarking in European Higher Education; A practical guide
20087
6 20083
7
A practical guide. Benchmarking in European Higher Education
200813
8 200862
9 200230

About Gero Federkeil

Gero Federkeil is a scholar working on Family Practice, Political Science and International Relations and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Governance and Development (4 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (1 paper), Higher Education and Employability (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Problem and Project Based Learning (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (5 citations), Education (92 citations) and General Health Professions (72 citations). Gero Federkeil has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fabian Bamberg, Martin R. Fischer, Martin Butzlaff, Christopher L. Schlett, Janosch Dahmen, Jan Sadlak, Uwe Brandenburg, Donald F. Westerheijden, Peter Wells and Katarzyna Anna Kuźmicz. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, Higher Education in Europe and Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026