Gerd Oberleitner
Impact in
-
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics
- International Law and Human Rights
-
- International Development and Aid
Papers in
-
- International Law and Human Rights 7
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 6
- International Human Rights and Reproductive Law 1
-
- Human Rights and Development 7
- Ombudsman and Human Rights 2
- Torture, Ethics, and Law 1
- Co-authors
- Wolfgang Benedek (1 shared paper)Meredeth Turshen (1 shared paper)Conor Gearty (1 shared paper)Manfred Nowak (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Modern Law Review (1 paper)Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations (1 paper)The International Journal of African Historical Studies (1 paper)Peace Review (1 paper)Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Austria
In The Last Decade
Gerd Oberleitner
11 papers receiving 68 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Political Science and International Relations 66
- Development 8
- Philosophy 18
- Sociology and Political Science 57
- History 11
Countries citing papers authored by Gerd Oberleitner
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerd Oberleitner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerd Oberleitner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerd Oberleitner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gerd Oberleitner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerd Oberleitner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerd Oberleitner. The network helps show where Gerd Oberleitner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Gerd Oberleitner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 29 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 25 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 8 | Global Human Rights Institutions: Between Remedy and Ritual | 2007 | 2 |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 1 |
About Gerd Oberleitner
Gerd Oberleitner is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Philosophy and Infectious Diseases, having authored 11 papers that have together received 94 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human Rights and Development (7 papers), International Law and Human Rights (7 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (6 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers), Ombudsman and Human Rights (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), International Human Rights and Reproductive Law (1 paper) and War, Ethics, and Justification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (66 citations), Development (8 citations), Philosophy (18 citations), Sociology and Political Science (57 citations) and History (11 citations). Gerd Oberleitner has collaborated with scholars based in Austria. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Benedek, Meredeth Turshen, Conor Gearty and Manfred Nowak. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Law Review, Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Peace Review and Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.