William Kristol

400 citations
6 papers · 139 indexed · h-index 4
Topics
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper)Science, Research, and Medicine (1 paper)International Relations and Foreign Policy (1 paper)
Journals
Foreign AffairsPerspectives on Political ScienceDigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)

In The Last Decade

William Kristol

4 papers receiving 100 citations

Peers

William Kristol
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Political Science and International Relations 92
  • Sociology and Political Science 64
  • Philosophy 14
  • Development 8
  • History 6
Replace Dorothy V. Jones with:
Dorothy V. Jones United States
Gerd Oberleitner Austria
Peter M. R. Stirk United Kingdom
J. L. Holzgrefe United States
Joseph de Maistre
Michael Joseph Smith United States
Victor V. Ramraj Singapore
Ariel Colonomos France
Norman Podhoretz
Edmund Ions United Kingdom
William Kristol relative to Dorothy V. Jones United States Dorothy V. Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dorothy V. Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Kristol

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Kristol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Kristol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Kristol more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Kristol

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Kristol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Kristol. The network helps show where William Kristol may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Kristol

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Kristol. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Kristol based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Kristol. William Kristol is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
The Neoconservative Persuasion: Selected Essays, 1942-2009
8
2 1
3
The Future is Now: America Confronts the New Genetics
7
4
Cloning, stem cells, and beyond
1
5 118
6
The Neoconservative Imagination: Essays in Honor of Irving Kristol
4

About William Kristol

William Kristol is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 6 papers that have together received 139 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper), Science, Research, and Medicine (1 paper) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (92 citations), Development (8 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (64 citations). William Kristol has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Kagan, Irving Kristol, Eric Cohen, Gertrude Himmelfarb and Éric A. Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, Perspectives on Political Science and DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026