Louise Arbour
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 10%
- Development
- Law
- Topics
- International Law and Human Rights (9 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers)Human Rights and Development (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaChile
In The Last Decade
Louise Arbour
17 papers receiving 81 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Political Science and International Relations 82
- Sociology and Political Science 60
- History 21
- Development 11
- Law 10
Countries citing papers authored by Louise Arbour
This map shows the geographic impact of Louise Arbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise Arbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise Arbour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louise Arbour
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise Arbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise Arbour. The network helps show where Louise Arbour may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louise Arbour
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louise Arbour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louise Arbour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louise Arbour. Louise Arbour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 55 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Integrating Security, Development and Human Rights | 1 |
| 8 | Beyond Self-Congratulation: The Charter at 25 in an International Perspective | 2 |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | The prosecutor of a permanent international criminal court : international workshop in co-operation with the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals (ICTY and ICTR), Freiburg im Breisgau, May 1998 | 1 |
| 15 | The Prosecution of International Crimes: Prospects and Pitfalls | 1 |
| 16 | The Status of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda: Goals and Results | 3 |
| 17 | La Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme | 3 |
| 18 | History and Future of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda | 2 |
| 19 | Progress and Challenges in International Criminal Justice | 5 |
About Louise Arbour
Louise Arbour is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 111 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (9 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers) and Human Rights and Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (82 citations), Development (11 citations) and History (21 citations). Louise Arbour has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Mac Darrow, Aryeh Neier, Andrew Sanders, Кай Амбос, Albin Eser, Lars Waldorf and Dustin N. Sharp. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Review of International Studies and American Journal of International Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.