Eva Lüllmann

823 total citations
8 papers, 645 citations indexed

About

Eva Lüllmann is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Eva Lüllmann has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 645 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Eva Lüllmann's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). Eva Lüllmann is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). Eva Lüllmann collaborates with scholars based in Germany. Eva Lüllmann's co-authors include Tania M. Lincoln, Winfried Rief, Michael Ziegler, Stephanie Mehl, Matthias J. Müller, Marie-Luise Kesting and Stefan Westermann and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Schizophrenia Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Eva Lüllmann

8 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Eva Lüllmann Germany	8	545	330	234	181	101	8	645
Helen Spencer United Kingdom	11	352 0.6×	194 0.6×	200 0.9×	117 0.6×	58 0.6×	24	496
Dorie Reed United States	6	480 0.9×	218 0.7×	213 0.9×	154 0.9×	85 0.8×	11	574
Francesca Vitzthum Germany	9	510 0.9×	347 1.1×	171 0.7×	227 1.3×	38 0.4×	12	585
Emily C. Gagen United States	12	376 0.7×	198 0.6×	231 1.0×	179 1.0×	57 0.6×	20	532
Wayne Zito United States	10	408 0.7×	136 0.4×	224 1.0×	113 0.6×	112 1.1×	12	492
Guy Dodgson United Kingdom	14	484 0.9×	234 0.7×	204 0.9×	171 0.9×	92 0.9×	33	714
A.S. Bellack United States	5	573 1.1×	236 0.7×	235 1.0×	123 0.7×	128 1.3×	11	652
Dagmar Versmissen Netherlands	10	570 1.0×	281 0.9×	296 1.3×	226 1.2×	83 0.8×	13	744
Marcel Kurtz Germany	6	462 0.8×	169 0.5×	169 0.7×	195 1.1×	85 0.8×	9	583
Clare Hadley United Kingdom	5	780 1.4×	453 1.4×	382 1.6×	268 1.5×	154 1.5×	7	873

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Lüllmann

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Lüllmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Lüllmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Lüllmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Lüllmann

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Lüllmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Lüllmann. The network helps show where Eva Lüllmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Lüllmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Lüllmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Lüllmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Lüllmann. Eva Lüllmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Lüllmann, Eva & Tania M. Lincoln. (2013). The Effect of an Educating versus Normalizing Approach on Treatment Motivation in Patients Presenting with Delusions: An Experimental Investigation with Analogue Patients. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2013. 1–8. 15 indexed citations

Lincoln, Tania M., Michael Ziegler, Stephanie Mehl, et al.. (2012). Moving from efficacy to effectiveness in cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis: A randomized clinical practice trial.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 80(4). 674–686. 66 indexed citations

Lüllmann, Eva, et al.. (2011). Benefits and harms of providing biological causal models in the treatment of psychosis – An experimental study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 42(4). 447–453. 13 indexed citations

Mehl, Stephanie, et al.. (2010). Social performance is more closely associated with theory of mind and autobiographical memory than with psychopathological symptoms in clinically stable patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Psychiatry Research. 178(2). 276–283. 57 indexed citations

Lincoln, Tania M., Michael Ziegler, Eva Lüllmann, Matthias J. Müller, & Winfried Rief. (2010). Can delusions be self-assessed? Concordance between self- and observer-rated delusions in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research. 178(2). 249–254. 69 indexed citations

Mehl, Stephanie, Winfried Rief, Eva Lüllmann, et al.. (2010). Are Theory of Mind Deficits in Understanding Intentions of Others Associated With Persecutory Delusions?. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 198(7). 516–519. 34 indexed citations

Mehl, Stephanie, Winfried Rief, Eva Lüllmann, et al.. (2010). Implicit attributional style revisited: Evidence for a state-specific “self-decreasing” implicit attributional style in patients with persecutory delusions. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. 15(5). 451–476. 8 indexed citations

Lincoln, Tania M., Eva Lüllmann, & Winfried Rief. (2006). Correlates and Long-Term Consequences of Poor Insight in Patients With Schizophrenia. A Systematic Review. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 33(6). 1324–1342. 383 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact