Stephen F. Teiser
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (12 papers)Indian and Buddhist Studies (8 papers)Japanese History and Culture (3 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewThe Journal of Asian StudiesJournal of the American Academy of Religion
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen F. Teiser
15 papers receiving 125 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Sociology and Political Science 152
- Cultural Studies 63
- Religious studies 43
- Anthropology 40
- Political Science and International Relations 25
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen F. Teiser
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen F. Teiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen F. Teiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen F. Teiser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen F. Teiser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen F. Teiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen F. Teiser. The network helps show where Stephen F. Teiser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen F. Teiser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen F. Teiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen F. Teiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen F. Teiser. Stephen F. Teiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | WRITTEN MONUMENTS OF THE ORIENT | 1 |
| 4 | Readings of the Platform sūtra | 8 |
| 5 | Scripture of the Lotus blossom of the fine dharma (the Lotus sūtra) | 3 |
| 6 | Readings of the Lotus Sūtra | 2 |
| 7 | Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma (The Lotus Sutra): with a new foreword by Stephen F. Teiser [revised edition] | 1 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 |
About Stephen F. Teiser
Stephen F. Teiser is a scholar working on Religious studies, Cultural Studies and Anthropology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 186 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (12 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (8 papers) and Japanese History and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (43 citations), Cultural Studies (63 citations) and Anthropology (40 citations). Stephen F. Teiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Romeyn Taylor, Leon Hurvitz, Michael Friedrich and Nicholas Sims‐Williams. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Asian Studies and Journal of the American Academy of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.