Janet R. Goodwin
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- George J. TanabeD. GuptaPeter KornickiIsabel McMullenAnne WalthallEdward KamensJ.G. SuttonMargaret H. Childs
- Topics
- Japanese History and Culture (12 papers)Chinese history and philosophy (6 papers)Asian Culture and Media Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
Janet R. Goodwin
18 papers receiving 55 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Cultural Studies 58
- Sociology and Political Science 50
- Anthropology 14
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 8
- Molecular Biology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Janet R. Goodwin
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet R. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet R. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet R. Goodwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet R. Goodwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet R. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet R. Goodwin. The network helps show where Janet R. Goodwin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet R. Goodwin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet R. Goodwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet R. Goodwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet R. Goodwin. Janet R. Goodwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | What Expert Teachers Think: A Look at Principal Leadership Behaviors That Facilitate Exemplary Classroom Instructional Practice. | 1 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | Making It Realtime: Exploring the Use of Optimized Realtime Environments for Historical Simulation and Education. | 2 |
| 7 | Digital Preservation of Cultural Heritage through Constructive Modeling. | 2 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Janet R. Goodwin
Janet R. Goodwin is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Religious studies and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 27 papers that have together received 102 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (12 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (6 papers) and Asian Culture and Media Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (58 citations), Anthropology (14 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (7 citations). Janet R. Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include George J. Tanabe, D. Gupta, Peter Kornicki, Isabel McMullen, Anne Walthall, Edward Kamens, J.G. Sutton, Margaret H. Childs, Kevin J. Wilson and Turlif Vilbrandt. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Steroids and The Journal of Asian Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.