Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in K-12 education
202393 citationsCatherine Adams, Gillian Lemermeyer et al.Computers and Education Artificial Intelligenceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey Rockwell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey Rockwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey Rockwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey Rockwell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey Rockwell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey Rockwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey Rockwell. The network helps show where Geoffrey Rockwell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey Rockwell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey Rockwell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey Rockwell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey Rockwell. Geoffrey Rockwell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rockwell, Geoffrey, et al.. (2019). From Shortcut to Sleight of Hand: Why the Checklist Approach in the EU Guidelines Does Not Work. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
5.
Zhang, Jinman, et al.. (2017). The Game of Writing: Gamification and Social Commenting in Writing Instruction.. DH.1 indexed citations
6.
Rockwell, Geoffrey, et al.. (2016). The Trace of Theory: Extracting Subsets from Large Collections.. DH. 85–92.1 indexed citations
Ruecker, Stan, et al.. (2012). Workflows as Structured Surfaces.. DH. 324–326.1 indexed citations
13.
Rockwell, Geoffrey & Stéfan Sinclair. (2012). The Swallow Flies Swiftly Through: An Analysis of Humanist.. DH. 339–341.1 indexed citations
14.
Rockwell, Geoffrey, et al.. (2012). CWRC-Writer: An In-Browser XML Editor.. DH. 508–510.3 indexed citations
15.
Sinclair, Stéfan & Geoffrey Rockwell. (2012). Introduction to Distant Reading Techniques with Voyant Tools, Multilingual Edition.. DH. 26.1 indexed citations
16.
Rockwell, Geoffrey, et al.. (2011). The Interface of the Collection.. DH. 64–70.
17.
Sinclair, Stéfan & Geoffrey Rockwell. (2011). Introduction to Text Analysis With Voyeur Tools.. DH. 18.1 indexed citations
18.
Rockwell, Geoffrey, et al.. (2011). Computing in Canada: a History of the Incunabular Years.. DH. 207–209.3 indexed citations
19.
Sinclair, Stéfan & Geoffrey Rockwell. (2010). Introduction to Text Analysis Using JiTR and Voyeur.. DH. 25.1 indexed citations
20.
Antonijević, Smiljana, Tobias Blanke, David J. Bodenhamer, et al.. (2010). Building the Humanities Lab: Scholarly Practices in Virtual Research Environments.. DH. 44–45.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.