Geneva Jonathan

13 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Geneva Jonathan
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Applied Psychology 243
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 83
  • General Health Professions 133
  • Speech and Hearing 24
Replace Gina Chinnery with:
Gina Chinnery Australia
Nandita Mathur United States
Briana Cloutier Canada
Stephanie C. Acquilano United States
Kathryn Soltis United States
Sophie Walsh United Kingdom
Gabrielle Jones Australia
Puffin O’Hanlon United Kingdom
Don Thompson United States
Marjo Kurki Finland
Geneva Jonathan relative to Gina Chinnery Australia Gina Chinnery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gina Chinnery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geneva Jonathan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geneva Jonathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geneva Jonathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geneva Jonathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geneva Jonathan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geneva Jonathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geneva Jonathan. The network helps show where Geneva Jonathan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Geneva Jonathan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geneva Jonathan Line = papers co-authored together Geneva Jonathan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2018122
2 201642
3 201834
4 202126
5 201721
6 201718
7 202213
8 201913
9 202111
10 202110
11 20216
12 20244
13 20242

About Geneva Jonathan

Geneva Jonathan is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (243 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (82 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (83 citations), General Health Professions (133 citations) and Speech and Hearing (24 citations). Geneva Jonathan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Dror Ben‐Zeev, Rachel Brian, Elizabeth Carpenter–Song, Robert E. Drake, Emily A. Scherer, Lisa A. Razzano, Sandra Steingard, Kelly A. Aschbrenner, Evan H Goulding and David C. Mohr. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, JMIR Mental Health, Psychiatric Services, JAMA Psychiatry and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact