Emily A. Scherer

3.9k total citations
79 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Emily A. Scherer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily A. Scherer has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Applied Psychology, 23 papers in Clinical Psychology and 23 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emily A. Scherer's work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (21 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (19 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers). Emily A. Scherer is often cited by papers focused on Digital Mental Health Interventions (21 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (19 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers). Emily A. Scherer collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Emily A. Scherer's co-authors include Dror Ben‐Zeev, Andrew T. Campbell, Rachel Brian, John M. Kane, Tanzeem Choudhury, Marta Hauser, Haiyi Xie, Rui Wang, Rui Wang and Alan J. Budney and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PEDIATRICS.

In The Last Decade

Emily A. Scherer

77 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Emily A. Scherer
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Applied Psychology 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 824
  • General Health Professions 688
  • Clinical Psychology 557
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 416
Replace Jennifer Duffecy with:
Jennifer Duffecy United States
Delwyn Catley United States
Raeanne C. Moore United States
Michelle Nicole Burns United States
Lisanne Warmerdam Netherlands
Eric Kuhn United States
Jerry L. Grenard United States
Jaime Delgadillo United Kingdom
Maria Faurholt‐Jepsen Denmark
Annet Kleiboer Netherlands
Jennifer Duffecy United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Emily A. Scherer
Emily A. Scherer · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Emily A. Scherer
Emily A. Scherer · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Emily A. Scherer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily A. Scherer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily A. Scherer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily A. Scherer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily A. Scherer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily A. Scherer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily A. Scherer. The network helps show where Emily A. Scherer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily A. Scherer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily A. Scherer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily A. Scherer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily A. Scherer. Emily A. Scherer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 3
3 7
4 10
5 14
6 14
7 29
8 19
9 3
10 62
11 12
12 4
13 22
14 3
15 99
16 22
17 1
18 2
19 56
20 281

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026