Emily A. Scherer
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dror Ben‐ZeevAndrew T. CampbellRachel BrianJohn M. KaneTanzeem ChoudhuryMarta HauserHaiyi XieRui Wang
- Topics
- Digital Mental Health Interventions (21 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (19 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPEDIATRICS
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Emily A. Scherer
77 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Applied Psychology 1.1k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 824
- General Health Professions 688
- Clinical Psychology 557
- Psychiatry and Mental health 416
Countries citing papers authored by Emily A. Scherer
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily A. Scherer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily A. Scherer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily A. Scherer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily A. Scherer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily A. Scherer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily A. Scherer. The network helps show where Emily A. Scherer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily A. Scherer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily A. Scherer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily A. Scherer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily A. Scherer. Emily A. Scherer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 62 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 99 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | 281 |
About Emily A. Scherer
Emily A. Scherer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (21 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (19 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (824 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (416 citations). Emily A. Scherer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dror Ben‐Zeev, Andrew T. Campbell, Rachel Brian, John M. Kane, Tanzeem Choudhury, Marta Hauser, Haiyi Xie, Rui Wang, Rui Wang and Alan J. Budney. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.