Puffin O’Hanlon

546 total citations
9 papers, 292 citations indexed

About

Puffin O’Hanlon is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Puffin O’Hanlon has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 292 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Applied Psychology and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Puffin O’Hanlon's work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers). Puffin O’Hanlon is often cited by papers focused on Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers). Puffin O’Hanlon collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and India. Puffin O’Hanlon's co-authors include Sonia Johnson, Golnar Aref-Adib, David Osborn, Jenny Gu, Alasdair Churchard, Kate Fullarton, Clara Strauss, Nicola Morant, Andrew Sommerlad and Fergal W. Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, Implementation Science and BMC Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Puffin O’Hanlon

9 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Puffin O’Hanlon United Kingdom 7 155 125 95 67 66 9 292
Briana Cloutier Canada 5 163 1.1× 121 1.0× 62 0.7× 68 1.0× 75 1.1× 8 274
Isabell Paetzold Germany 8 93 0.6× 162 1.3× 47 0.5× 57 0.9× 85 1.3× 13 272
Pooja Chandrashekar United States 6 154 1.0× 78 0.6× 93 1.0× 47 0.7× 55 0.8× 12 263
Sophie Walsh United Kingdom 9 83 0.5× 106 0.8× 82 0.9× 105 1.6× 47 0.7× 10 263
Glyn Davies United Kingdom 13 204 1.3× 75 0.6× 151 1.6× 54 0.8× 39 0.6× 33 346
Álvaro Jiménez-Molina Chile 9 88 0.6× 146 1.2× 59 0.6× 107 1.6× 63 1.0× 22 307
Fanny Kählke Germany 10 215 1.4× 162 1.3× 61 0.6× 89 1.3× 115 1.7× 16 349
Jan Mokkenstorm Netherlands 12 101 0.7× 294 2.4× 73 0.8× 171 2.6× 41 0.6× 17 381
Marjo Kurki Finland 12 108 0.7× 163 1.3× 62 0.7× 55 0.8× 24 0.4× 27 285
Olivia M. Riffle United States 3 183 1.2× 89 0.7× 71 0.7× 83 1.2× 102 1.5× 4 305

Countries citing papers authored by Puffin O’Hanlon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Puffin O’Hanlon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Puffin O’Hanlon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Puffin O’Hanlon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Puffin O’Hanlon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Puffin O’Hanlon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Puffin O’Hanlon. The network helps show where Puffin O’Hanlon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Puffin O’Hanlon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Puffin O’Hanlon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Puffin O’Hanlon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Puffin O’Hanlon. Puffin O’Hanlon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Lamb, Danielle, Alyssa Milton, Rebecca Forsyth, et al.. (2024). Implementation of a crisis resolution team service improvement programme: a qualitative study of the critical ingredients for success. International Journal of Mental Health Systems. 18(1). 18–18. 2 indexed citations
2.
Steare, Thomas, Jasmine Harju‐Seppänen, Puffin O’Hanlon, et al.. (2021). A qualitative study of stakeholder views on the use of a digital app for supported self-management in early intervention services for psychosis. BMC Psychiatry. 21(1). 311–311. 22 indexed citations
3.
Steare, Thomas, Puffin O’Hanlon, David Osborn, et al.. (2020). Smartphone-delivered self-management for first-episode psychosis: the ARIES feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 10(8). e034927–e034927. 24 indexed citations
4.
Steare, Thomas, Puffin O’Hanlon, David Osborn, et al.. (2019). App to support Recovery in Early Intervention Services (ARIES) study: protocol of a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a self-management Smartphone application for psychosis. BMJ Open. 9(3). e025823–e025823. 9 indexed citations
5.
Cavanagh, Kate, Alasdair Churchard, Puffin O’Hanlon, et al.. (2018). A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Brief Online Mindfulness-Based Intervention in a Non-clinical Population: Replication and Extension. Mindfulness. 9(4). 1191–1205. 81 indexed citations
6.
Aref-Adib, Golnar, Tayla McCloud, Jamie Ross, et al.. (2018). Factors affecting implementation of digital health interventions for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder, and their family and friends: a systematic review. The Lancet Psychiatry. 6(3). 257–266. 78 indexed citations
8.
Aref-Adib, Golnar, Puffin O’Hanlon, Kate Fullarton, et al.. (2016). A qualitative study of online mental health information seeking behaviour by those with psychosis. BMC Psychiatry. 16(1). 232–232. 69 indexed citations
9.
Strauss, Clara, et al.. (2014). A meta-analysis examining the psychological benefits of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for healthcare practitioners. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026