G. Scott Acton

732 total citations
9 papers, 501 citations indexed

About

G. Scott Acton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Scott Acton has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 501 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in G. Scott Acton's work include Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers). G. Scott Acton is often cited by papers focused on Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers). G. Scott Acton collaborates with scholars based in United States and Belgium. G. Scott Acton's co-authors include William Revelle, Mark Wilson, Paul De Boeck, David H. Schroeder, Sharon M. Hall, Aaron S. Kaplan, Judith J. Prochaska, Janice Y. Tsoh and Hiroyuki Yamada and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Review, Psychological Medicine and Addictive Behaviors.

In The Last Decade

G. Scott Acton

9 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
G. Scott Acton United States	9	205	150	83	74	73	9	501
Carlos Gantiva Colombia	11	137 0.7×	107 0.7×	176 2.1×	80 1.1×	77 1.1×	76	525
Kfir Asraf Israel	11	145 0.7×	169 1.1×	115 1.4×	74 1.0×	74 1.0×	28	574
Joran Jongerling Netherlands	15	216 1.1×	157 1.0×	108 1.3×	32 0.4×	82 1.1×	49	670
J.F.J. van Leeuwe Netherlands	12	360 1.8×	57 0.4×	74 0.9×	37 0.5×	92 1.3×	21	582
Dennis Upper United States	8	233 1.1×	56 0.4×	115 1.4×	55 0.7×	58 0.8×	14	559
Thomas Pronk Netherlands	11	103 0.5×	178 1.2×	35 0.4×	23 0.3×	120 1.6×	21	434
Antonio Solanas Spain	15	223 1.1×	107 0.7×	179 2.2×	45 0.6×	30 0.4×	45	834
Damien Lekkas United States	13	186 0.9×	127 0.8×	107 1.3×	50 0.7×	133 1.8×	33	512
Yan Huo United States	8	139 0.7×	103 0.7×	47 0.6×	19 0.3×	60 0.8×	12	466
Unnati Patel Canada	6	129 0.6×	66 0.4×	47 0.6×	191 2.6×	119 1.6×	8	511

Countries citing papers authored by G. Scott Acton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Scott Acton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Scott Acton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Scott Acton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Scott Acton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Scott Acton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Scott Acton. The network helps show where G. Scott Acton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Scott Acton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Scott Acton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Scott Acton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Scott Acton. G. Scott Acton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Yamada, Hiroyuki, G. Scott Acton, & Janice Y. Tsoh. (2008). Differential item functioning of the English and Chinese versions of the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. Addictive Behaviors. 34(2). 125–133. 13 indexed citations

2.

Boeck, Paul De, Mark Wilson, & G. Scott Acton. (2005). A Conceptual and Psychometric Framework for Distinguishing Categories and Dimensions.. Psychological Review. 112(1). 129–158. 100 indexed citations

3.

Acton, G. Scott, et al.. (2005). The construct of internalization: conceptualization, measurement, and prediction of smoking treatment outcome. Psychological Medicine. 35(3). 395–408. 29 indexed citations

4.

Acton, G. Scott, et al.. (2005). Classification of Psychopathology. Theory & Psychology. 15(3). 373–399. 21 indexed citations

5.

Acton, G. Scott & William Revelle. (2004). Evaluation of Ten Psychometric Criteria for Circumplex Structure. RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology). 9(1). 1–27. 23 indexed citations

6.

Acton, G. Scott. (2003). Measurement of Impulsivity in a Hierarchical Model of Personality Traits: Implications for Substance Use. Substance Use & Misuse. 38(1). 67–83. 139 indexed citations

7.

Acton, G. Scott & William Revelle. (2002). Interpersonal Personality Measures Show Circumplex Structure Based on New Psychometric Criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment. 79(3). 446–471. 69 indexed citations

8.

Acton, G. Scott, et al.. (2001). Depression and stages of change for smoking in psychiatric outpatients. Addictive Behaviors. 26(5). 621–631. 58 indexed citations

9.

Acton, G. Scott & David H. Schroeder. (2001). Sensory discrimination as related to general intelligence. Intelligence. 29(3). 263–271. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact