Agricultural Water Management

8.4k papers and 277.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.4k papers published in Agricultural Water Management in the last decades have received a total of 277.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Agricultural Water Management usually cover Soil Science (4.7k papers), Plant Science (3.3k papers) and Global and Planetary Change (2.8k papers) specifically the topics of Irrigation Practices and Water Management (4.0k papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (2.5k papers) and Soil and Unsaturated Flow (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Agricultural Water Management are L. S. Pereira, Shaozhong Kang, Theib Oweis, Frank Rijsberman, Dirk Raes, J. B. Passioura, Jiřı́ Šimůnek, Dennis Wichelns, W.G.M. Bastiaanssen and Ali Reza Sepaskhah.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Agricultural Water Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Agricultural Water Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Agricultural Water Management.

Countries where authors publish in Agricultural Water Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Agricultural Water Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Agricultural Water Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agricultural Water Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025