Frida Pemer

639 total citations
22 papers, 412 citations indexed

About

Frida Pemer is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Frida Pemer has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 412 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 9 papers in Strategy and Management and 9 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Frida Pemer's work include Management and Organizational Studies (9 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (7 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers). Frida Pemer is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (9 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (7 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers). Frida Pemer collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and Netherlands. Frida Pemer's co-authors include Andreas Werr, Mattia Bianchi, Bente R. Løwendahl, Jost Sieweke, Love Börjeson, Caspar van den Berg, Michael Howlett, Helen Gunter, Michael Howard and Andrea Migone and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Management Studies and Human Relations.

In The Last Decade

Frida Pemer

21 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frida Pemer Sweden 13 179 159 115 80 77 22 412
Alex Z. Kondra Canada 5 142 0.8× 182 1.1× 66 0.6× 89 1.1× 35 0.5× 7 432
Thomas Armbrüster Germany 9 261 1.5× 223 1.4× 113 1.0× 91 1.1× 35 0.5× 17 509
Manuel Hensmans Belgium 9 194 1.1× 177 1.1× 41 0.4× 125 1.6× 34 0.4× 21 454
Maria Cadiz Dyball Australia 14 73 0.4× 111 0.7× 165 1.4× 89 1.1× 28 0.4× 31 522
Alan Simon Australia 12 153 0.9× 200 1.3× 167 1.5× 58 0.7× 31 0.4× 32 473
Parveen P. Gupta United States 12 128 0.7× 205 1.3× 156 1.4× 57 0.7× 33 0.4× 35 630
James W. Fairfield‐Sonn United States 5 205 1.1× 163 1.0× 112 1.0× 88 1.1× 22 0.3× 11 453
Marie‐Soleil Tremblay Canada 9 129 0.7× 211 1.3× 179 1.6× 68 0.8× 51 0.7× 15 623
David Hatherly United Kingdom 14 82 0.5× 132 0.8× 172 1.5× 57 0.7× 23 0.3× 43 661
Raili Pollanen Canada 9 109 0.6× 173 1.1× 254 2.2× 62 0.8× 32 0.4× 12 557

Countries citing papers authored by Frida Pemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frida Pemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frida Pemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frida Pemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frida Pemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frida Pemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frida Pemer. The network helps show where Frida Pemer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frida Pemer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frida Pemer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frida Pemer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frida Pemer. Frida Pemer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jönsson, Anna, et al.. (2025). Adapting to learn and learning to adapt: How professional service firms organize for ambidextrous learning. Management Learning. 57(1). 47–68.
2.
Jönsson, Anna, et al.. (2024). Generative AI Beyond the Hype—New Technologies in the Face of Organizing and Organizations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 60(4). 623–630. 2 indexed citations
3.
Pemer, Frida & Andreas Werr. (2023). Defusing Digital Disruption Through Creative Accumulation: Technology‐Induced Innovation in Professional Service Firms. Journal of Management Studies. 62(5). 1945–1990. 17 indexed citations
4.
Pemer, Frida. (2020). Enacting Professional Service Work in Times of Digitalization and Potential Disruption. Journal of Service Research. 24(2). 249–268. 54 indexed citations
5.
Berg, Caspar van den, Michael Howlett, Andrea Migone, et al.. (2019). Policy Consultancy in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 17 indexed citations
6.
Pemer, Frida, Love Börjeson, & Andreas Werr. (2019). The role of chief executive tenure for public organizations' hiring of management consultants. Governance. 33(2). 269–285. 15 indexed citations
7.
Pemer, Frida, et al.. (2019). The cues that matter: Screening for quality signals in the ex ante phase of buying professional services. Journal of Business Research. 98. 352–365. 29 indexed citations
8.
Pemer, Frida, Jost Sieweke, & Andreas Werr. (2018). The relationship between national culture and the use of professional services: Evidence from two cross-country studies. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 24(4). 314–325. 10 indexed citations
10.
Pemer, Frida, et al.. (2017). Adopt or Adapt? Unpacking the Role of Institutional Work Processes in the Implementation of New Regulations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 28(1). 138–154. 32 indexed citations
11.
Pemer, Frida, et al.. (2016). Purchasing Policy or Purchasing Police? The Influence of Institutional Logics and Power on Responses to Purchasing Formalization. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 52(4). 5–21. 20 indexed citations
12.
Pemer, Frida, Love Börjeson, & Andreas Werr. (2016). Government Agencies' Hiring of Management Consulting Services in Sweden - An Explorative Study. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2016(1). 12201–12201. 2 indexed citations
13.
Pemer, Frida, et al.. (2015). Dealing with institutional complexity: Public procurement of management consulting services. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015(1). 16251–16251. 1 indexed citations
14.
Pemer, Frida, Andreas Werr, & Mattia Bianchi. (2014). Purchasing professional services: A transaction cost view of the antecedents and consequences of purchasing formalization. Industrial Marketing Management. 43(5). 840–849. 37 indexed citations
15.
Pemer, Frida & Andreas Werr. (2013). The Uncertain Management Consulting Services Client. International Studies of Management and Organization. 43(3). 22–40. 13 indexed citations
16.
Pemer, Frida, et al.. (2012). Client and Consultant Logics on the Purchasing of Consulting Services. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2012(1). 11408–11408. 1 indexed citations
17.
Pemer, Frida, et al.. (2012). The appropriated language: Dominant stories as a source of organizational inertia. Human Relations. 65(1). 89–110. 64 indexed citations
18.
Pemer, Frida. (2008). Framgång eller fiasko? : en studie av hur konsultprojekt värderas i klientorganisationer. 4 indexed citations
19.
Werr, Andreas & Frida Pemer. (2007). Purchasing management consulting services—From management autonomy to purchasing involvement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 13(2). 98–112. 46 indexed citations
20.
Werr, Andreas & Frida Pemer. (2005). PURCHASING MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS - FROM PERSONAL TIES TO ORGANIZATIONAL PROCEDURES.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2005(1). B1–B6. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026