Frederik Ahlemann

4.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
85 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Frederik Ahlemann is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederik Ahlemann has authored 85 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Management Information Systems, 20 papers in Information Systems and 15 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Frederik Ahlemann's work include Information Technology Governance and Strategy (36 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (22 papers) and ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (16 papers). Frederik Ahlemann is often cited by papers focused on Information Technology Governance and Strategy (36 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (22 papers) and ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (16 papers). Frederik Ahlemann collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frederik Ahlemann's co-authors include Nils Urbach, Christine Legner, Tilo Böhmann, Paul Drews, Alexander Mädche, Torsten Eymann, Thomas Heß, Christian Matt, Michael G. Kaiser and Gerold Riempp and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, IEEE Access and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Frederik Ahlemann

80 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Resea... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 2017 400 800 1.2k

Peers

Frederik Ahlemann
Muhammad Mustafa Kamal United Kingdom
Andrew P. McAfee United States
Vishanth Weerakkody United Kingdom
Silvana Trimi United States
Frederick J. Riggins United States
Bongsug Chae United States
Muhammad Mustafa Kamal United Kingdom
Frederik Ahlemann
Citations per year, relative to Frederik Ahlemann Frederik Ahlemann (= 1×) peers Muhammad Mustafa Kamal

Countries citing papers authored by Frederik Ahlemann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederik Ahlemann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederik Ahlemann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederik Ahlemann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederik Ahlemann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederik Ahlemann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederik Ahlemann. The network helps show where Frederik Ahlemann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederik Ahlemann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederik Ahlemann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederik Ahlemann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederik Ahlemann. Frederik Ahlemann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ahlemann, Frederik, et al.. (2020). HOW DO YOU DRIVE? ANALYZING VEHICLE SENSORDATA IN PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2 indexed citations
2.
Müller, Thomas, et al.. (2017). BALANCING ALIGNMENT, ADAPTIVITY, AND EFFECTIVENESS: DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR SUSTAINABLE IT PROJECT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1503. 2 indexed citations
3.
Ahlemann, Frederik, et al.. (2016). THE STRUCTURAL ANCHORING OF IS/IT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: TOWARD AN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN THEORY. European Conference on Information Systems. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ahlemann, Frederik, et al.. (2015). Not Everybody's Darling - Investigating the Acceptance of Benefits Management and Moderating Organizational Characteristics. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 585–599. 2 indexed citations
5.
Urbach, Nils, et al.. (2015). Why don't you stick to them? Understanding factors influencing and counter-measures to combat deviant behavior towards organizational IT standards. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 615–629. 6 indexed citations
6.
Urbach, Nils, et al.. (2014). Understanding the Organizational Antecedents of Bottom-Up Un-Enacted Projects : Towards a Conceptual Model Based on Deviance Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2 indexed citations
7.
Ahlemann, Frederik, et al.. (2013). Resistant Use of Project Management Methodologies – Using Psychology to Rethink the Influence of Methodology Attributes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 100. 1 indexed citations
8.
Urbach, Nils, et al.. (2013). Understanding IT Governance Success and its Impact: Results from an Interview Study. ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth). 55. 12 indexed citations
9.
Ahlemann, Frederik, et al.. (2013). Exploiting Is/It Projects' Potential - Towards A Design Theory For Benefits Management. European Conference on Information Systems. 210. 10 indexed citations
10.
Ahlemann, Frederik, et al.. (2012). THE EFFECTS OF INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL AGENCY PROBLEMS ON IS PROJECT ALIGNMENT. European Conference on Information Systems. 201. 5 indexed citations
11.
Legner, Christine, et al.. (2012). BEYOND EA FRAMEWORKS: TOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE ADOPTION OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENT. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 241. 26 indexed citations
12.
Ahlemann, Frederik, et al.. (2011). A Theory of User Acceptance of IS Project Management Methodologies: Understanding the Influence of Psychological Determinism and Experience. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 24. 1 indexed citations
13.
Mueller, Benjamin, et al.. (2010). Understanding the Success of Strategic IT/IS Benchmarking: Results from a Multiple-Case Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 6 indexed citations
14.
Braun, Jessica L., et al.. (2010). Understanding Benefits Management Success: Results of a Field Study.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 65. 11 indexed citations
15.
Braun, Jessica L., et al.. (2010). HOW BENEFITS FROM IS/IT INVESTMENTS ARE SUCCESSFULLY REALIZED: THE ROLE OF BUSINESS PROCESS KNOW HOW AND BENEFITS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. International Conference on Information Systems. 120. 6 indexed citations
16.
Ahlemann, Frederik, et al.. (2010). Measuring Project Management Information Systems Success: Towards a Conceptual Model and Survey Instrument. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 20. 14 indexed citations
17.
Teuteberg, Frank, et al.. (2009). SEMANTIC BENCHMARKING OF PROCESS MODELS AN ONTOLOGY -BASED APPROACH. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 89. 3 indexed citations
18.
Legner, Christine, et al.. (2009). The (Lacking) Business Perspective on SOA - Critical Themes in SOA Research. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 45–54. 36 indexed citations
19.
Müller, Benjamin, Frederik Ahlemann, & Gerold Riempp. (2009). A Framework for Strategic Positioning in IT Management. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK. 25–34. 5 indexed citations
20.
Riempp, Gerold, Benjamin Mueller, & Frederik Ahlemann. (2008). Towards a Framework to Structure and Assess Strategic IT/IS Management. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2484–2495. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026