Frederik Ahlemann
- Management Information Systems top 0.5%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Information Systems and Management top 0.5%
- Information Systems top 2%
- Co-authors
- Nils UrbachChristine LegnerTilo BöhmannPaul DrewsAlexander MädcheTorsten EymannThomas HeßChristian Matt
- Topics
- Information Technology Governance and Strategy (36 papers)Big Data and Business Intelligence (22 papers)ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (16 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaIEEE AccessSustainability
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Frederik Ahlemann
80 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Management Information Systems 874
- Strategy and Management 630
- Sociology and Political Science 592
- Information Systems and Management 551
- Information Systems 426
Countries citing papers authored by Frederik Ahlemann
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederik Ahlemann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederik Ahlemann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederik Ahlemann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederik Ahlemann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederik Ahlemann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederik Ahlemann. The network helps show where Frederik Ahlemann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederik Ahlemann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederik Ahlemann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederik Ahlemann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederik Ahlemann. Frederik Ahlemann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | HOW DO YOU DRIVE? ANALYZING VEHICLE SENSORDATA IN PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS | 2 |
| 2 | BALANCING ALIGNMENT, ADAPTIVITY, AND EFFECTIVENESS: DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR SUSTAINABLE IT PROJECT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT | 2 |
| 3 | THE STRUCTURAL ANCHORING OF IS/IT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: TOWARD AN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN THEORY | 1 |
| 4 | Not Everybody's Darling - Investigating the Acceptance of Benefits Management and Moderating Organizational Characteristics | 2 |
| 5 | Why don't you stick to them? Understanding factors influencing and counter-measures to combat deviant behavior towards organizational IT standards | 6 |
| 6 | Understanding the Organizational Antecedents of Bottom-Up Un-Enacted Projects : Towards a Conceptual Model Based on Deviance Theory | 2 |
| 7 | Resistant Use of Project Management Methodologies – Using Psychology to Rethink the Influence of Methodology Attributes | 1 |
| 8 | Understanding IT Governance Success and its Impact: Results from an Interview Study | 12 |
| 9 | Exploiting Is/It Projects' Potential - Towards A Design Theory For Benefits Management | 10 |
| 10 | THE EFFECTS OF INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL AGENCY PROBLEMS ON IS PROJECT ALIGNMENT | 5 |
| 11 | BEYOND EA FRAMEWORKS: TOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE ADOPTION OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENT | 26 |
| 12 | A Theory of User Acceptance of IS Project Management Methodologies: Understanding the Influence of Psychological Determinism and Experience | 1 |
| 13 | Understanding the Success of Strategic IT/IS Benchmarking: Results from a Multiple-Case Study | 6 |
| 14 | Understanding Benefits Management Success: Results of a Field Study. | 11 |
| 15 | HOW BENEFITS FROM IS/IT INVESTMENTS ARE SUCCESSFULLY REALIZED: THE ROLE OF BUSINESS PROCESS KNOW HOW AND BENEFITS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES | 6 |
| 16 | Measuring Project Management Information Systems Success: Towards a Conceptual Model and Survey Instrument | 14 |
| 17 | SEMANTIC BENCHMARKING OF PROCESS MODELS AN ONTOLOGY -BASED APPROACH | 3 |
| 18 | The (Lacking) Business Perspective on SOA - Critical Themes in SOA Research | 36 |
| 19 | A Framework for Strategic Positioning in IT Management | 5 |
| 20 | Towards a Framework to Structure and Assess Strategic IT/IS Management | 17 |
About Frederik Ahlemann
Frederik Ahlemann is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Strategy and Management, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Technology Governance and Strategy (36 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (22 papers) and ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (874 citations), Information Systems and Management (551 citations) and Strategy and Management (630 citations). Frederik Ahlemann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Nils Urbach, Christine Legner, Tilo Böhmann, Paul Drews, Alexander Mädche, Torsten Eymann, Thomas Heß, Christian Matt, Michael G. Kaiser and Gerold Riempp. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, IEEE Access and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.