Ernst Kapp
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
-
- Digital Media and Philosophy
Papers in
-
- Technology, Environment, Urban Planning 3
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Kurt von Fritz (4 shared papers)Glenn R. Morrow (1 shared paper)Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff (1 shared paper)Malcolm F. McGregor (1 shared paper)Aristotle (1 shared paper)Sterling Dow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)Harvard Law Review (1 paper)The American Journal of Philology (1 paper)Grey Room (1 paper)edoc (University of Basel) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Oman
In The Last Decade
Ernst Kapp
10 papers receiving 43 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- History and Philosophy of Science 9
- Computer Science Applications 5
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 1
- Anthropology 8
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 4
Countries citing papers authored by Ernst Kapp
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernst Kapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernst Kapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernst Kapp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ernst Kapp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernst Kapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernst Kapp. The network helps show where Ernst Kapp may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Ernst Kapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 3 | 1952 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1951 | 6 | |
| 5 | Die Dramatische Technik Des Sophokles | 2020 | 2 |
| 6 | Der Ursprung der Logik bei den Griechen | 1965 | 1 |
| 7 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1952 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1968 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 11 | Líneas fundamentales de una filosofía de la técnica | 1998 | 1 |
| 12 | 1953 | 1 |
About Ernst Kapp
Ernst Kapp is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology, History and Philosophy of Science, Information Systems and Classics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 56 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Technology, Environment, Urban Planning (3 papers), Cybernetics and Technology in Society (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (1 paper), Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies (1 paper) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations), Computer Science Applications (5 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (1 citation), Anthropology (8 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (4 citations). Ernst Kapp has collaborated with scholars based in Oman. Frequent co-authors include Kurt von Fritz, Glenn R. Morrow, Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Malcolm F. McGregor, Aristotle and Sterling Dow. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Harvard Law Review, The American Journal of Philology, Grey Room and edoc (University of Basel).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.