Fred Rush

868 total citations
21 papers, 180 citations indexed

About

Fred Rush is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Fred Rush has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 180 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Philosophy, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Fred Rush's work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers) and Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (2 papers). Fred Rush is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers) and Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (2 papers). Fred Rush collaborates with scholars based in United States. Fred Rush's co-authors include Alexander Nehamas, Hong Kim, Otto Schmid, Vito Giannini, A. Eshraghi, Raymond Geuss, Joseph Bernstein, Hauke Brunkhorst, Kenneth Baynes and Simone Chambers and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.

In The Last Decade

Fred Rush

15 papers receiving 160 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fred Rush United States 6 58 54 46 29 23 21 180
Jacques David France 9 175 3.0× 39 0.7× 41 0.9× 28 1.0× 9 0.4× 77 311
Michael Petry Germany 7 53 0.9× 23 0.4× 1 0.0× 37 1.3× 4 0.2× 34 152
Heiner F. Klemme Germany 5 85 1.5× 10 0.2× 14 0.5× 14 0.6× 31 154
Charles Rosen United States 8 11 0.2× 4 0.1× 5 0.1× 28 1.0× 8 0.3× 34 258
Federico García Lorca France 7 49 0.8× 13 0.2× 6 0.1× 21 0.7× 1 0.0× 93 173
Michael Baur United States 5 100 1.7× 8 0.1× 2 0.0× 60 2.1× 14 177
Robert M. Fowler Netherlands 6 17 0.3× 9 0.2× 2 0.0× 50 1.7× 12 0.5× 8 130
Todd F. Davis United States 5 28 0.5× 2 0.0× 6 0.1× 20 0.7× 2 0.1× 15 198
Rene Novak New Zealand 4 6 0.1× 7 0.1× 4 0.1× 15 0.5× 3 0.1× 7 65
J.M. Bremer Netherlands 8 24 0.4× 13 0.2× 30 1.0× 5 0.2× 26 156

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Rush. The network helps show where Fred Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fred Rush

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fred Rush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fred Rush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fred Rush. Fred Rush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bernstein, J. M., et al.. (2022). Art and Aesthetics after Adorno. Fordham University Press eBooks.
2.
Rush, Fred. (2021). A Philosopher Looks at Architecture. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 80(1). 109–112. 1 indexed citations
3.
Giannini, Vito, et al.. (2019). 9.2 A 192-Virtual-Receiver 77/79GHz GMSK Code-Domain MIMO Radar System-on-Chip. 164–166. 76 indexed citations
4.
Rush, Fred. (2016). Irony and Idealism: Rereading Schlegel, Hegel, and Kierkegaard. 1 indexed citations
5.
Rush, Fred. (2016). Irony and Idealism. Oxford University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
6.
Rush, Fred. (2014). Bernhard, Suffering, and the Value of Language. The German Quarterly. 87(3). 351–369.
7.
Rush, Fred. (2010). Hegel, Humour, and the Ends of Art. 31(2). 1–22. 1 indexed citations
8.
Rush, Fred, et al.. (2010). Glaube und Vernunft/Faith and Reason.
10.
Rush, Fred. (2008). On architecture. 5 indexed citations
11.
Rush, Fred. (2007). Adorno's Negative Dialectic: Philosophy and the Possibility of Critical Rationality. The Philosophical Review. 116(1). 131–135. 4 indexed citations
12.
Rush, Fred. (2005). Symposium: Arthur Danto,The Abuse of Beauty. Inquiry. 48(2). 172–188. 2 indexed citations
13.
Rush, Fred, Michael A. Rosen, Joel Whitebook, et al.. (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 34 indexed citations
14.
Rush, Fred. (2001). The Availability of Heidegger?s Later Thought. Inquiry. 44(2). 201–222.
15.
Rush, Fred. (2001). The Harmony of the Faculties. Kant-Studien. 92(1). 15 indexed citations
16.
Rush, Fred. (2000). Reason and Regulation in Kant. ˜The œreview of metaphysics. 53(4). 837. 4 indexed citations
17.
Rush, Fred. (1998). The Unity of Reason. The Journal of Philosophy. 95(3). 149–159. 21 indexed citations
18.
Rush, Fred, Dieter Henrich, Richard L. Velkley, et al.. (1998). The Unity of Reason: Essays in Kant's Philosophy.. The Journal of Philosophy. 95(3). 149–149. 4 indexed citations
19.
Rush, Fred, et al.. (1997). Aesthetic Ideology. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 55(4). 443–443.
20.
Rush, Fred. (1997). Paul De Man, Aesthetic Ideology. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 55(4). 443–444.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026