Kenneth Baynes
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Clinical Psychology
- Law top 5%
- Co-authors
- Axel HonnethJohn P. WilsonThomas J. McCarthyJames BohmanHans JoasRaymond A. MeyerRené von SchombergSimone Chambers
- Topics
- Political Philosophy and Ethics (12 papers)Critical Theory and Philosophy (11 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsThe Philosophical ReviewThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kenneth Baynes
29 papers receiving 487 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Sociology and Political Science 367
- Political Science and International Relations 212
- Philosophy 116
- Clinical Psychology 42
- Law 37
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Baynes
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Baynes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Baynes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Baynes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Baynes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Baynes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Baynes. The network helps show where Kenneth Baynes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth Baynes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth Baynes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth Baynes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth Baynes. Kenneth Baynes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | Discourse and Democracy Essays on Habermas's Between Facts and Norms | 23 |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | Categorical Principles of Law: A Counterpoint to Modernity | 6 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 171 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Rational Reconstruction and Social Criticism: Habermas's Model of Interpretive Social Science | 12 |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | After Philosophy: End or Transformation? | 95 |
About Kenneth Baynes
Kenneth Baynes is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Law, having authored 32 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (12 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (11 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (116 citations), Political Science and International Relations (212 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (367 citations). Kenneth Baynes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Axel Honneth, John P. Wilson, Thomas J. McCarthy, James Bohman, Axel Honneth, Hans Joas, Raymond A. Meyer, René von Schomberg, Simone Chambers and Romand Coles. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The Philosophical Review and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.