Stephen Hinds
Impact in
- Anthropology top 1%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
- Anthropology 18
- Classical Antiquity Studies 18
- Historical and Literary Studies 2
- Classics 3
- Byzantine Studies and History 2
- Co-authors
- Michèle LowrieBetty Rose NagleMichael von AlbrechtPhilip HardieAlessandro BarchiesiDenis FeeneyJames E. G. ZetzelThomas Schmitz
- Journals
- Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici (4 papers)The Journal of Roman Studies (3 papers)The Classical World (2 papers)Phoenix (2 papers)The Classical Quarterly (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen Hinds
23 papers receiving 259 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Anthropology 349
- Classics 82
- Archeology 178
- Philosophy 77
- Literature and Literary Theory 54
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hinds
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hinds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hinds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hinds more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hinds
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hinds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hinds. The network helps show where Stephen Hinds may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hinds, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 36 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 81 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 7 | |
| 12 | Reflexive annotation in poetic allusion | 1995 | 3 |
| 13 | 1989 | 62 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 44 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 42 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 46 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 2 |
About Stephen Hinds
Stephen Hinds is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics, Archeology, History and Religious studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (18 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (349 citations), Classics (82 citations), Archeology (178 citations), Philosophy (77 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (54 citations). Stephen Hinds has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michèle Lowrie, Betty Rose Nagle, Michael von Albrecht, Philip Hardie, Alessandro Barchiesi, Denis Feeney, James E. G. Zetzel, Thomas Schmitz, C. Collard and Aymeric Vié. Their work appears in journals such as Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici, The Journal of Roman Studies, The Classical World, Phoenix and The Classical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.