Frank Crispino

1.2k citations
47 papers · 751 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 16

Frank Crispino

41 papers receiving 696 citations

Hit Papers

The Sydney declaration – Revisiting the essence of forens...962022202620232024255075

Peers

Frank Crispino
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Toxicology 37
  • Safety Research 78
  • Information Systems 205
  • Genetics 232
  • Space and Planetary Science 10
Replace Max M. Houck with:
Max M. Houck United States
D. Michael Risinger United States
Tacha Hicks Switzerland
David A. Stoney United States
Keith Inman United States
Jennifer L. Mnookin United States
Glenn Langenburg United States
C.J. de Poot Netherlands
R. Cook United Kingdom
Mariya Goray Australia
Frank Crispino relative to Max M. Houck United States Max M. Houck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Max M. Houck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frank Crispino

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Crispino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Crispino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Crispino more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Crispino

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Crispino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Crispino. The network helps show where Frank Crispino may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frank Crispino, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frank Crispino Line = papers co-authored together Frank Crispino links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20240
4 20230
5 20233
6
The Sydney declaration – Revisiting the essence of forensic science through its fundamental principlesbreakdown →
202296
7 202117
8 202015
9 202018
10 201913
11 20193
12 201821
13
What if counterfeit IDs could talk? Chemical profiling of identity documents
20173
14 201624
15 201694
16 20142
17 20139
18 200743
19
Le principe de Locard est-il scientifique ? Ou analyse de la scientificité des principes fondamentaux de la criminalistique
200612
20 20052

About Frank Crispino

Frank Crispino is a scholar working on Biophysics, Genetics and Safety Research, having authored 47 papers that have together received 751 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (17 papers), Digital and Cyber Forensics (5 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (4 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (4 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (3 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (3 papers) and Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (37 citations), Safety Research (78 citations) and Information Systems (205 citations). Frank Crispino has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Olivier Ribaux, Claude Roux, Damien Rhumorbarbe, Julian Broséus, David Décary-Hêtu, Pierre Margot, Éric Loranger, James Robertson, Olivier Delémont and Chris Lennard. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Carbohydrate Polymers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026