Fernando Doménech-Betoret
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Amparo Gómez-ArtigaLaura Abellán Roselló
- Topics
- Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers)Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers)Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (3 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthFrontiers in PsychologyLearning and Individual Differences
- Partner nations
- Spain
In The Last Decade
Fernando Doménech-Betoret
8 papers receiving 396 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Education 209
- Social Psychology 137
- Clinical Psychology 95
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 70
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Doménech-Betoret
This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Doménech-Betoret's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Doménech-Betoret with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Doménech-Betoret more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Doménech-Betoret
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Doménech-Betoret. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Doménech-Betoret. The network helps show where Fernando Doménech-Betoret may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fernando Doménech-Betoret
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fernando Doménech-Betoret. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fernando Doménech-Betoret based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fernando Doménech-Betoret. Fernando Doménech-Betoret is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | Self-Efficacy, Satisfaction, and Academic Achievement: The Mediator Role of Students' Expectancy-Value Beliefsbreakdown → | 286 |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 32 |
About Fernando Doménech-Betoret
Fernando Doménech-Betoret is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Education, having authored 8 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers) and Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (209 citations), Social Psychology (137 citations) and Computer Science Applications (33 citations). Fernando Doménech-Betoret has collaborated with scholars based in Spain. Frequent co-authors include Amparo Gómez-Artiga and Laura Abellán Roselló. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychology and Learning and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.