Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Felix Oberholzer‐Gee
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Oberholzer‐Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Oberholzer‐Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Oberholzer‐Gee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Oberholzer‐Gee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Oberholzer‐Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Oberholzer‐Gee. The network helps show where Felix Oberholzer‐Gee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felix Oberholzer‐Gee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felix Oberholzer‐Gee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felix Oberholzer‐Gee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Felix Oberholzer‐Gee. Felix Oberholzer‐Gee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Frei, Frances X. & Felix Oberholzer‐Gee. (2017). Better, Simpler Strategy.
2.
Hałaburda, Hanna & Felix Oberholzer‐Gee. (2014). The Limits to Scale: Companies That Get Big Fast Are Often Left Behind. Harvard business review. 92(4).1 indexed citations
3.
Oberholzer‐Gee, Felix, et al.. (2013). Doing Business in Cambodia. Advances in Therapy. 37(2). 973–973.1 indexed citations
Khanna, Tarun, Felix Oberholzer‐Gee, Hsiang‐Jui Kung, & Li Li. (2008). Industrial policy, technology advances and industry development: evidence from the chinese software industry.1 indexed citations
Hagiu, Andrei, et al.. (2006). Production I.G: Challenging the Status Quo.1 indexed citations
11.
Oberholzer‐Gee, Felix & Koleman Strumpf. (2005). Brief Amici Curiae: Supreme Court of the United States, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc., et al., v. Grokster, Ltd., et al..1 indexed citations
12.
Oberholzer‐Gee, Felix & Koleman Strumpf. (2004). P2P’s Impact on Recorded Music Sales. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 20(1). 130–3.5 indexed citations
Oberholzer‐Gee, Felix, Joel Waldfogel, & Matthew White. (2003). Social Learning and Coordination in High-Stakes Games: Evidence from Friend or Foe. National Bureau of Economic Research.1 indexed citations
Borchardt, Knut, Gary S. Becker, Robert S. Chirinko, et al.. (1999). Wars and Markets: how bond values reflect World War II. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Oberholzer‐Gee, Felix, Bruno S. Frey, Albert Gailord Hart, & Werner W. Pommerehne. (1995). Panik, Protest und Paralyse Eine empirische Untersuchung über nukleare Endlager in der Schweiz. Zeitschrift für schweizerische Statistik und Volkswirtschaft/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik/Swiss journal of economics and statistics. 131. 147–177.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.