The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out

1.0k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1997, received 1.0k indexed citations. Written by Bruno S. Frey and Felix Oberholzer‐Gee covering the research area of General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (399 citations), Economics and Econometrics (363 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (238 citations). Published in American Economic Review.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7894942 →

Countries where authors are citing The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7894942.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026