Felicity Osborne
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Julie HickinWendy BestDavid HowardRuth HerbertDaniel T. SmithRoger NewportVincent WalshStephen R. Jackson
- Topics
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers)Language Development and Disorders (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Felicity Osborne
12 papers receiving 367 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Cognitive Neuroscience 368
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 243
- General Health Professions 63
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
- Rehabilitation 36
Countries citing papers authored by Felicity Osborne
This map shows the geographic impact of Felicity Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felicity Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felicity Osborne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Felicity Osborne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felicity Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felicity Osborne. The network helps show where Felicity Osborne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felicity Osborne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felicity Osborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felicity Osborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felicity Osborne. Felicity Osborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | POWERS: Profile of Word Errors and Retrieval in Speech | 7 |
| 2 | 88 | |
| 3 | Efficacy of treatment: effects on word retrieval and conversation. | 9 |
| 4 | Lexical and functionally based treatment: Effects on word retrieval and conversation | 4 |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 69 | |
| 8 | 105 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | Phonological facilitation of aphasic naming and predicting the outcome of treatment for anomia | 9 |
| 12 | 13 |
About Felicity Osborne
Felicity Osborne is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (243 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (368 citations) and Rehabilitation (36 citations). Felicity Osborne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Julie Hickin, Wendy Best, David Howard, Ruth Herbert, Daniel T. Smith, Roger Newport, Vincent Walsh, Stephen R. Jackson and Derek Howard. Their work appears in journals such as Brain and Language, Cortex and International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.