Ruth Herbert

955 total citations
34 papers, 613 citations indexed

About

Ruth Herbert is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Herbert has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 613 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Ruth Herbert's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (27 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (11 papers). Ruth Herbert is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (27 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (11 papers). Ruth Herbert collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Australia. Ruth Herbert's co-authors include Wendy Best, David Howard, Julie Hickin, Felicity Osborne, Emma Gregory, Carolyn Bruce, Rosemary Varley, Elizabeth Anderson and Derek Howard and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain and Language, Cortex and Behavior Research Methods.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Herbert

34 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Herbert United Kingdom 12 564 371 100 88 77 34 613
Janet Webster United Kingdom 15 542 1.0× 372 1.0× 90 0.9× 49 0.6× 93 1.2× 37 626
Madeleine Pritchard United Kingdom 14 349 0.6× 225 0.6× 114 1.1× 66 0.8× 71 0.9× 16 431
Gayle DeDe United States 18 784 1.4× 567 1.5× 50 0.5× 148 1.7× 47 0.6× 42 884
Carolyn Bruce United Kingdom 11 352 0.6× 198 0.5× 70 0.7× 88 1.0× 49 0.6× 27 453
Christos Salis United Kingdom 14 437 0.8× 230 0.6× 57 0.6× 79 0.9× 105 1.4× 41 585
G. Albyn Davis United States 11 439 0.8× 269 0.7× 68 0.7× 95 1.1× 66 0.9× 21 553
Jon G. Lyon United States 9 521 0.9× 200 0.5× 143 1.4× 54 0.6× 150 1.9× 15 631
Lisa A. Edmonds United States 15 835 1.5× 474 1.3× 131 1.3× 72 0.8× 180 2.3× 47 918
Felicity Osborne United Kingdom 9 368 0.7× 243 0.7× 63 0.6× 49 0.6× 36 0.5× 12 379
Erica L. Middleton United States 17 582 1.0× 433 1.2× 44 0.4× 184 2.1× 61 0.8× 39 820

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Herbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Herbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Herbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Herbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Herbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Herbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Herbert. The network helps show where Ruth Herbert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Herbert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Herbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Herbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Herbert. Ruth Herbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Herbert, Ruth, et al.. (2021). Novel matched stimuli for assessment of lexical semantics. Aphasiology. 36(7). 831–853. 1 indexed citations
2.
Herbert, Ruth, et al.. (2020). ‘It’s Not OK’, but ‘It’ never happened: parental alienation accusations undermine children’s safety in the New Zealand Family Court. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 42(1). 106–117. 6 indexed citations
3.
Herbert, Ruth, et al.. (2019). Syntactic cueing of spoken naming in jargon aphasia. Aphasiology. 35(1). 126–147. 1 indexed citations
4.
Herbert, Ruth, et al.. (2018). Collaborative design of accessible information with people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 33(12). 1504–1530. 22 indexed citations
5.
Herbert, Ruth, et al.. (2018). Gulf Arabic nouns and verbs: A standardized set of 319 object pictures and 141 action pictures, with predictors of naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods. 50(6). 2408–2425. 18 indexed citations
6.
Herbert, Ruth, et al.. (2015). Morpho-syntactic processing of Arabic plurals after aphasia: dissecting lexical meaning from morpho-syntax within word boundaries. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 32(6). 340–367. 4 indexed citations
7.
Herbert, Ruth, Elizabeth Anderson, Wendy Best, & Emma Gregory. (2014). Activation of syntax in lexical production in healthy speakers and in aphasia. Cortex. 57. 212–226. 4 indexed citations
8.
Best, Wendy, et al.. (2013). Aphasia rehabilitation: Does generalisation from anomia therapy occur and is it predictable? A case series study. Cortex. 49(9). 2345–2357. 62 indexed citations
9.
Herbert, Ruth, et al.. (2013). A Normative Database and Determinants of Lexical Retrieval for 186 Arabic Nouns: Effects of Psycholinguistic and Morpho-Syntactic Variables on Naming Latency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 43(6). 749–769. 13 indexed citations
10.
Herbert, Ruth, et al.. (2012). Effects of syntactic cueing therapy on picture naming and connected speech in acquired aphasia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 22(4). 609–633. 14 indexed citations
11.
Gregory, Emma, Rosemary Varley, & Ruth Herbert. (2012). Determiner Primes as Facilitators of Lexical Retrieval in English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 41(6). 439–453. 4 indexed citations
12.
Best, Wendy, et al.. (2010). A controlled study of changes in conversation following aphasia therapy for anomia. Disability and Rehabilitation. 33(3). 229–242. 40 indexed citations
13.
Herbert, Ruth & Wendy Best. (2009). The role of noun syntax in spoken word production: Evidence from aphasia. Cortex. 46(3). 329–342. 17 indexed citations
14.
Herbert, Ruth, Julie Hickin, David Howard, Felicity Osborne, & Wendy Best. (2008). Do picture‐naming tests provide a valid assessment of lexical retrieval in conversation in aphasia?. Aphasiology. 22(2). 184–203. 88 indexed citations
15.
Hickin, Julie, Ruth Herbert, Wendy Best, David Howard, & Felicity Osborne. (2007). Efficacy of treatment: effects on word retrieval and conversation.. UCL Discovery (University College London). 9 indexed citations
16.
Best, Wendy, Ruth Herbert, Julie Hickin, Felicity Osborne, & David Howard. (2002). Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: Immediate and delayed effects. Aphasiology. 16(1-2). 151–168. 69 indexed citations
17.
Hickin, Julie, Wendy Best, Ruth Herbert, David Howard, & Felicity Osborne. (2001). TREATMENT OF WORD RETRIEVAL IN APHASIA: GENERALISATION TO CONVERSATIONAL SPEECH. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 36(S1). 13–18. 16 indexed citations
18.
Bruce, Carolyn, et al.. (2001). THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SELF‐DIRECTED AND PEER‐BASED CLINICAL TRAINING PROGRAMME. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 36(S1). 401–405. 7 indexed citations
19.
Herbert, Ruth, Wendy Best, Julie Hickin, David Howard, & Felicity Osborne. (2001). PHONOLOGICAL AND ORTHOGRAPHIC APPROACHES TO THE TREATMENT OF WORD RETRIEVAL IN APHASIA. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 36(S1). 7–12. 7 indexed citations
20.
Best, Wendy, Julie Hickin, Ruth Herbert, David Howard, & Felicity Osborne. (2000). Phonological facilitation of aphasic naming and predicting the outcome of treatment for anomia. Brain and Language. 74(3). 435–438. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026