Daniel T. Smith

2.9k total citations
113 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Daniel T. Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Organic Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel T. Smith has authored 113 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 59 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in Organic Chemistry and 10 papers in Pharmaceutical Science. Recurrent topics in Daniel T. Smith's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (41 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (38 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (12 papers). Daniel T. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (41 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (38 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (12 papers). Daniel T. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Daniel T. Smith's co-authors include Thomas Schenk, Chris Rorden, Amanda Ellison, Keira Ball, Stephen R. Jackson, Geoff G. Cole, Mark A. Atkinson, Riyi Shi, Stephen R. Byrn and David Pearson and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Brain and Langmuir.

In The Last Decade

Daniel T. Smith

111 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel T. Smith United Kingdom 25 1.2k 191 176 174 170 113 2.1k
Stefan Koch Germany 26 1.1k 0.9× 330 1.7× 88 0.5× 180 1.0× 115 0.7× 78 2.6k
Makoto Miyazaki Japan 23 548 0.5× 203 1.1× 93 0.5× 39 0.2× 169 1.0× 116 1.7k
Phillip Grant Germany 19 644 0.5× 373 2.0× 45 0.3× 81 0.5× 227 1.3× 46 2.0k
Xin Di China 33 2.3k 1.9× 404 2.1× 127 0.7× 92 0.5× 148 0.9× 129 3.5k
Junji Ito Japan 25 717 0.6× 68 0.4× 36 0.2× 33 0.2× 58 0.3× 107 2.3k
Kyoko Konishi Canada 19 563 0.5× 153 0.8× 103 0.6× 116 0.7× 92 0.5× 43 1.6k
Rebecca Stowe United Kingdom 20 988 0.8× 92 0.5× 444 2.5× 47 0.3× 48 0.3× 29 5.5k
Vishal Kapoor Germany 12 640 0.5× 151 0.8× 23 0.1× 96 0.6× 124 0.7× 24 1.4k
Wen‐Lan Wu China 30 158 0.1× 33 0.2× 77 0.4× 113 0.6× 71 0.4× 143 2.7k
Saori Tanaka Japan 26 1.3k 1.0× 353 1.8× 62 0.4× 61 0.4× 172 1.0× 117 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Smith. The network helps show where Daniel T. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel T. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel T. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel T. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel T. Smith. Daniel T. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hiew, Tze Ning, Prapti Kafle, Dmitry Zemlyanov, et al.. (2024). The importance of surface composition and wettability on the dissolution performance of high drug loading amorphous dispersion formulations. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 114(1). 289–303. 7 indexed citations
2.
McGregor, Anthony, et al.. (2023). Dynamic resource allocation in spatial working memory during full and partial report tasks. Journal of Vision. 23(2). 10–10. 1 indexed citations
3.
Nie, Haichen, Chad Dalton, James D. Ormes, et al.. (2022). High Bulk-Density Amorphous Dispersions to Enable Direct Compression of Reduced Tablet Size Amorphous Dosage Units. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 112(8). 2037–2045. 8 indexed citations
4.
Benmore, Chris J., Oliver L. G. Alderman, Brian R. Cherry, et al.. (2022). The Structure of Liquid and Glassy Carbamazepine. Quantum Beam Science. 6(4). 31–31. 5 indexed citations
5.
Zeller, Mat­thias, et al.. (2021). Maleate salts of bedaquiline. Acta Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications. 77(4). 433–445. 3 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Daniel T., et al.. (2021). Spatial attention and spatial short term memory in PSP and Parkinson's disease. Cortex. 137. 49–60. 11 indexed citations
7.
Bogdanowich-Knipp, Susan, et al.. (2021). Salts and Polymorph Screens for Bedaquiline. AAPS PharmSciTech. 22(7). 228–228. 12 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Daniel T., et al.. (2020). Crystal structures of salts of bedaquiline. Acta Crystallographica Section C Structural Chemistry. 76(11). 1010–1023. 7 indexed citations
9.
Slessor, Gillian, et al.. (2018). Gaze-cueing and endogenous attention operate in parallel. Acta Psychologica. 192. 172–180. 3 indexed citations
10.
Becker, Linda, Daniel T. Smith, & Thomas Schenk. (2017). Investigating the familiarity effect in texture segmentation by means of event-related brain potentials. Vision Research. 140. 120–132. 4 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Daniel T., et al.. (2016). Aum Shinrikyo’s Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Development Efforts. Journal of Strategic Security. 9(1). 35–48. 7 indexed citations
12.
Cole, Geoff G., et al.. (2016). Do humans spontaneously take the perspective of others?. Acta Psychologica. 164. 165–168. 63 indexed citations
13.
Aimola, Lina, et al.. (2013). Efficacy and Feasibility of Home-Based Training for Individuals With Homonymous Visual Field Defects. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 28(3). 207–218. 53 indexed citations
14.
Ball, Keira, Daniel T. Smith, Amanda Ellison, & Thomas Schenk. (2010). A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search. Experimental Brain Research. 204(4). 585–594. 16 indexed citations
15.
Sun, Wenjing, et al.. (2010). Potassium channel blocker, 4-aminopyridine-3-methanol, restores axonal conduction in spinal cord of an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Experimental Neurology. 227(1). 232–235. 30 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Daniel T., Keira Ball, Amanda Ellison, & Thomas Schenk. (2009). Deficits of reflexive attention induced by abduction of the eye. Neuropsychologia. 48(5). 1269–1276. 30 indexed citations
17.
Carey, David P., Daniel T. Smith, Douglas S. Martin, et al.. (2008). The bi-pedal ape: Plasticity and asymmetry in footedness. Cortex. 45(5). 650–661. 45 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Daniel T., et al.. (2008). Immediate and delayed actions share a common visuomotor transformation mechanism: A prism adaptation study. Neuropsychologia. 47(6). 1546–1552. 13 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Daniel T. & Thomas Schenk. (2007). Reflexive attention improves change detection (but only briefly). Perception. 36. 0–0. 1 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Daniel T., Chris Rorden, & Stephen R. Jackson. (2004). Exogenous Orienting of Attention Depends upon the Ability to Execute Eye Movements. Current Biology. 14(9). 792–795. 86 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026