Felicity Kaganas

458 citations
25 papers · 200 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Legal Issues in South Africa (8 papers)Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (6 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers)

In The Last Decade

Felicity Kaganas

23 papers receiving 167 citations

Peers

Felicity Kaganas
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Sociology and Political Science 126
  • Demography 61
  • Law 56
  • Political Science and International Relations 39
  • Health 37
Replace Katherine O’Donovan with:
Katherine O’Donovan United Kingdom
Belinda Fehlberg Australia
Clare Dalton United States
Christine Piper United Kingdom
Lisa R. Pruitt United States
Constance Backhouse Canada
Marsha Garrison United States
Rae Kaspiew Australia
Helen Stalford͌ United Kingdom
Andrew Bainham United Kingdom
Felicity Kaganas relative to Katherine O’Donovan United Kingdom Katherine O’Donovan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Katherine O’Donovan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felicity Kaganas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felicity Kaganas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felicity Kaganas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felicity Kaganas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felicity Kaganas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felicity Kaganas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felicity Kaganas. The network helps show where Felicity Kaganas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felicity Kaganas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felicity Kaganas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felicity Kaganas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felicity Kaganas. Felicity Kaganas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2
Domestic Abuse and Child Contact: International Experience
1
3 14
4 0
5
Grandparents’ Rights and Grandparents’ Campaigns
3
6 6
7 21
8 38
9
Shared parenting: A 70% solution?
3
10 8
11
Family law, gender and the state
12
12
Family Law, Gender and the State: Text, Cases and Materials
13
13
Legislating for harmony : partnership under the Children Act 1989
9
14 16
15
Law and Women's Rights in South Africa: An Overview
5
16 6
17 4
18 4
19 1
20 1

About Felicity Kaganas

Felicity Kaganas is a scholar working on Law, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 25 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Issues in South Africa (8 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (6 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (56 citations), Demography (61 citations) and Health (37 citations). Felicity Kaganas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Latvia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Shelley Day Sclater, Christina Murray, Christine Piper, Rosemary Hunter and Michael King. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Law and Society, Modern Law Review and International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026