Christine Piper
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Safety Research top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Michael C. KingSusan EastonFelicity KaganasShelley Day SclaterCaroline HunterMichael KingMichelle BriggsDavid Stonehouse
- Topics
- Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers)Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Christine Piper
28 papers receiving 243 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Sociology and Political Science 189
- Clinical Psychology 108
- Safety Research 57
- General Health Professions 52
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 47
Countries citing papers authored by Christine Piper
This map shows the geographic impact of Christine Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christine Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christine Piper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christine Piper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christine Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christine Piper. The network helps show where Christine Piper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christine Piper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christine Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christine Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christine Piper. Christine Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | Neglect neglected in the Crime and Courts Act | 0 |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | Investing in a Child’s Future: Too Risky? | 2 |
| 7 | Succumbing to Temptation--To Cheat or Not to Cheat?Faculty and Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity in Distance Education Courses | 2 |
| 8 | Investing in children : policy, law and practice in context | 12 |
| 9 | Sentencing and Punishment: The Quest for Justice | 26 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | Legislating for harmony : partnership under the Children Act 1989 | 9 |
| 16 | How the law thinks about children | 72 |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | The responsible parent : a study of divorce mediation | 4 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Christine Piper
Christine Piper is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Safety Research and Demography, having authored 29 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (36 citations), Safety Research (57 citations) and Clinical Psychology (108 citations). Christine Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. King, Susan Easton, Felicity Kaganas, Shelley Day Sclater, Caroline Hunter, Michael King, Michelle Briggs, David Stonehouse, Michael W. Hast and G. Russell Huffman. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Criminology, Journal of Pediatric Nursing and Children & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.