Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael King more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael King. The network helps show where Michael King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael King.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael King based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael King. Michael King is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
King, Michael, et al.. (2012). Reflections on the Connection of Virtue Ethics to Therapeutic Jurisprudence. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 35(3). 717–746.1 indexed citations
2.
King, Michael. (2011). Therapeutic Jurisprudence’s Challenge to the Judiciary. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
3.
Wexler, David & Michael King. (2011). Promoting Societal and Juridical Receptivity to Rehabilitation: The Role of Therapeutic Jurisprudence. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
4.
King, Michael. (2010). Should Problem Solving Courts be Solution-Focused Courts?. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
5.
King, Michael. (2008). Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Leadership and the Role of the Appeal Courts. 30(2). 201–213.1 indexed citations
6.
King, Michael. (2008). Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Criminal Law Practice: A Judicial Perspective. 31(1). 12–19.
7.
King, Michael. (2008). Restorative Justice, Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Rise of Emotionally Intelligent Justice. Melbourne University law review. 32(3). 1096–1126.21 indexed citations
8.
King, Michael, et al.. (2006). How the law defines the special educational needs of autistic children. CentAUR (University of Reading).3 indexed citations
9.
King, Michael. (2006). Exploring the Scope of Therapeutic Jurisprudence. 80(5). 49–51.
10.
King, Michael. (2005). Problems with Centralised Fisheries Management in Pacific Islands. Senri ethnological studies. 67(67). 181–195.3 indexed citations
11.
King, Michael, et al.. (2005). Country Magistrates Resolution on Therapeutic Jurisprudence. 32(2). 23–25.1 indexed citations
King, Michael. (2003). Roads to Healing: Applying Therapeutic Juirisprudence, Domestic Violence and Restraining Order Applications. 30(7). 14–16.1 indexed citations
15.
King, Michael. (2002). Geraldton Alternative Sentencing Regime: Applying Therapeutic and Holistic Jurisprudence in the Bush. 26(5). 260–271.6 indexed citations
16.
Prenzler, Tim & Michael King. (2002). The role of private investigators and commercial agents in law enforcement. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice. 234(234). 1–6.18 indexed citations
17.
Wilson, Stephen & Michael King. (2002). Magistrates as innovators. 29(11). 7–12.3 indexed citations
Kaganas, Felicity, Michael King, & Christine Piper. (1995). Legislating for harmony : partnership under the Children Act 1989.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.