Felecia Commodore

547 total citations
26 papers, 246 citations indexed

About

Felecia Commodore is a scholar working on Education, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Felecia Commodore has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 246 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Education, 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Felecia Commodore's work include Higher Education Research Studies (19 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (4 papers). Felecia Commodore is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Research Studies (19 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (4 papers). Felecia Commodore collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ghana. Felecia Commodore's co-authors include Marybeth Gasman, Clifton F. Conrad, Thai‐Huy Nguyen, Dominique J. Baker, Sydney Freeman, Marybeth Gasman, Lucy A. LePeau, Rachel A. Fischer, Mitchell R. Williams and Charles H.F. Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Higher Education, Research in Higher Education and The Journal of Negro Education.

In The Last Decade

Felecia Commodore

23 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Felecia Commodore United States 10 158 74 61 47 38 26 246
Lucy A. LePeau United States 10 208 1.3× 58 0.8× 68 1.1× 39 0.8× 31 0.8× 25 272
Cassie L. Barnhardt United States 10 140 0.9× 71 1.0× 42 0.7× 38 0.8× 39 1.0× 23 248
Eboni M. Zamani‐Gallaher United States 8 141 0.9× 81 1.1× 53 0.9× 31 0.7× 32 0.8× 22 235
Megan M. Holland United States 8 187 1.2× 135 1.8× 39 0.6× 29 0.6× 28 0.7× 14 262
Nana Osei-Kofi United States 9 142 0.9× 107 1.4× 41 0.7× 47 1.0× 13 0.3× 16 230
Ana M. Martínez‐Alemán United States 8 191 1.2× 148 2.0× 55 0.9× 32 0.7× 15 0.4× 13 288
Desiree D. Zerquera United States 10 227 1.4× 77 1.0× 64 1.0× 45 1.0× 17 0.4× 29 274
José F. Moreno United States 8 243 1.5× 100 1.4× 68 1.1× 28 0.6× 36 0.9× 9 310
Zorka Karanxha United States 10 166 1.1× 62 0.8× 50 0.8× 14 0.3× 29 0.8× 23 222
La’Tara Osborne-Lampkin United States 10 201 1.3× 56 0.8× 64 1.0× 13 0.3× 30 0.8× 21 296

Countries citing papers authored by Felecia Commodore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felecia Commodore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felecia Commodore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felecia Commodore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felecia Commodore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felecia Commodore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felecia Commodore. The network helps show where Felecia Commodore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felecia Commodore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felecia Commodore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felecia Commodore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felecia Commodore. Felecia Commodore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Commodore, Felecia, et al.. (2022). The Keys to Endurance: An Investigation of the Institutional Factors Relating to the Persistence of Historically Black Colleges and Universities. The Journal of Higher Education. 94(3). 310–332. 4 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Mitchell R., et al.. (2021). Preparing to Fill the Leadership Gap: The Challenges Facing Women Leaders in Mid-Level Positions at Urban Community Colleges. ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University).
3.
LePeau, Lucy A., et al.. (2021). Observable Evidence and Partnership Possibilities for Governing Board Involvement in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: A Content Analysis. Research in Higher Education. 63(2). 189–221. 9 indexed citations
4.
Commodore, Felecia, et al.. (2020). Toward Culturally Sustaining Governance in Higher Education: Best Practices of Theory, Research, and Practice. 38(1). 139–164. 11 indexed citations
5.
Commodore, Felecia, et al.. (2020). Hiding in Plain Sight: The Potential of State-Level Governing Boards in Postsecondary Education Policy Agenda-Setting. The Journal of Higher Education. 92(4). 570–595. 12 indexed citations
6.
Davis, Charles H.F., et al.. (2020). Lest We Forget: Continuing Historically Black Colleges and Universities’ Legacy of Fostering Social Change. 22(4). 12–13. 1 indexed citations
7.
Commodore, Felecia, et al.. (2019). Controlling images, comments, and online communities: A critical discourse analysis of conversations about Black Women HBCU presidents. Women s Studies International Forum. 78. 102330–102330. 9 indexed citations
8.
Commodore, Felecia, et al.. (2019). Reaching Back to Move Forward: The Historic and Contemporary Role of Student Activism in the Development and Implementation of Higher Education Policy. Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education. 42(5). 5–35. 16 indexed citations
10.
Commodore, Felecia, et al.. (2018). Coming Together: A Case Study of Collaboration Between Student Affairs and Faculty at Norfolk State University. Frontiers in Education. 3. 5 indexed citations
11.
Commodore, Felecia, et al.. (2018). Black Women College Students: A Guide to Student Success in Higher Education. ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University). 8 indexed citations
12.
Conrad, Clifton F., et al.. (2018). Practices of Remedial Mathematics Students Who Succeed in College: A Case Study of Developmental Math Education at Chief Dull Knife College. Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education. 42(1). 61–101. 8 indexed citations
13.
Commodore, Felecia, et al.. (2018). Black Women College Students. 19 indexed citations
14.
Gasman, Marybeth, et al.. (2016). Black male success in STEM: A case study of Morehouse College.. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 10(2). 181–200. 37 indexed citations
15.
Freeman, Sydney, et al.. (2016). Leaders Wanted! The Skills Expected and Needed for a Successful 21stCentury Historically Black College and University Presidency. Journal of Black Studies. 47(6). 570–591. 11 indexed citations
16.
Gasman, Marybeth, et al.. (2016). <em>Examining the Potential of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs</em>). The Journal of Negro Education. 85(4). 480–480.
17.
18.
Gasman, Marybeth, et al.. (2015). Advancing Black Male Success: Understanding the Contributions of Urban Black Colleges and Universities. Urban Education. 52(9). 1129–1139. 11 indexed citations
19.
Gasman, Marybeth, et al.. (2014). Understanding Honors Programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs): An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Negro Education. 83(4). 549–549. 1 indexed citations
20.
Conrad, Clifton F., et al.. (2013). Using Educational Data to Increase Learning, Retention, and Degree Attainment at Minority Serving Institutions. ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026